Dismissed

Sri. Rachuri Shankar alias Shiva Shankar v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC13 Jul 2023WP/6530/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ directing registration of a sale deed allegedly refused arbitrarily by Sub-Registrar. Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.

Sri. Rachuri Shankar alias Shiva Shankar Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32oe ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR^SUMALATHA

¶7

wRt T PETITION NO:6530 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sri Rachuri Shankar alias Shiva Shankar,^{S/o. Somaiah,Age.76 Years, Occ.} Business, R/o. H.No. 9-1-'1 , Behind^{Manasa Gardens,Champapet,} Hyderabad-79, T.S

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1.. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its^{Principal Secretary, Revenue Department} i iStamps and Registration), Secretariat,^Hyderabad.

¶13

The Commissioner and lnspector General^{of Registrationand Stamps Office,} R/o. 5-3-953, Nizam Shahi Rd,Mozamjahi^{lvlarket' Herza EstatqRisala} Abdullah Colony, Jam Bagh, Hyderabad,^{Telangana 500095}

¶14

The District Registrar, Ranga^{Reddy District, L.B Nagar, Sagar Ring Road,} Ranga Reddy District, T.S

¶15

The Sub Registrar, Office of^{the SubRegistrar,Abdullapurmet, R.R Dist' T S}

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of^{the constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavit filedtherewith,the High court may be} pleased to issue a writ, one in the nature of^a writ^{of Mandamusor any other} appropriate wirt, Direction^{or orderdeclaringthe actionof the 4th respondentin} not considering representation^{dated o9lo2t2o23,for acceptingthe sale deed} presented by the petitioner for registration^{of Plot bearing No. 254 admeasuring} 200 Sq.Yards rn survey^{No.221 situatedat AbdullapurVillage, Abdullapurmet} Revenue Mandal, Ranga^{Reddy Dist, T.s in favour of smt. A. NaveenaKumari,} D/o. A.Veera Swamy as illegal,^{arbitrary and violativeof principleFQ of natural} justice and consequently direct the 4th respondgnt^{to receive,lf registerthe sale} deed document^{presentecl by him in respectof above said land and releasethe} same, in the interest of^justice.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶19

Petition und<. Section 151 CPC praying that ir the circurnstances stated in the affidavit liled ir support of the petition, the High Ccr- rt nray be pleased to direct the 4th Resp, ,n lent to consider the representatron date,l 0910212023 o'f the petitioner herein in ho interest of justice.

¶20

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶21

Between:

¶22

Bandari liam:sh, S/o. B. Rangaiah, aged abort 48 ye:rrs, Occ. Business, R/o. H.Nrr.3- 1 Z, Omerkhanguda, Koheda VillaEe, l\trc -rllapurmet [tr'landal, Ranga Rr:ddr flistrict - 507511

¶23

..PETITIONER/PROPOSED R ESI>ONDENT No.S

¶24

1 Sri RachLrri S rankar alias Shiva Shankar, S/o. Somaialr, Ager.76 Years, Occ. Business. R o. H.No. 9-1-1 , Behind Mana;a t3arJens, Champapet, Hyderabad-7(^-- S

¶25

,..RESPO NDEt,IT/PETITIONER

¶26

2.. The Stale of l elangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,, R,lvelue Department ;(Stamps and I legistration), Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶27

The Comrniss orrer and lnspector General of Regi:;trati,r I :rnd Stamps Office, R/o 5-3.95:3,^,,li;:am Shahi Rd,lvlozamjahi lvlarket, Herz:a E:sta:e,.Risala Abdullah^(lolo ry, Jam Bagh, Hyderabad, Telangana 50C0!)5

¶28

The Distri:t R, rg strar, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. l',lagar fiagzrr Ring Road, Ranga Reddy District, T.S

¶29

5 The Sub tlegi ,trar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Abdullapur net, R.R Dist, T S

¶30

...RESPONDEI,Il S/FIESPONDENTS

¶31

Petition unrje fiection 151 CPC praying that ir the r:ir,:untstances stated in the affidavit f led n support of the petition, the High Cou 1 narr be pleased to permit the petiticner to implead the proposed responcent a; resg>ondent no.5 in the writ petition n \ P No. 653012023 in the interest of lustir:e

¶32

lA NO: 3 OF 2023

¶33

Petition unde [iection 151 CPC praying that in the r,ircunrstances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the Higtr Court rnay be pleased to issue a Writ, Ctre ir the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or an,i otrer appropriate Wirt, Direction or^(,rcler declaring the proceeding of the 4-h lespondent i.e. intimation of refusal v de refusal order No. 3312023, lrlotice I'lo.i 1112023 dated 0310512023 ir r;p.e of specific direction by this llr;nble court vide W P.No.10619t20'22 is highly illegal and arbitrary an(l violz tion rf principles of natural^justice and r et asrde the same and consequently cli er;t the Respondent

¶34

No.4 to register document P.No.103/2023^{on 2810412023and releasethe same} in the interest of^justice.

¶35

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI^{MOSHE MARPU}

¶36

Counsel for the Respondents: GP^{FOR STAMPSAND REGISTRATION}

¶37

Counsel for the Proposed Respondent:^{SRI E. MARUTHIRAJA}

¶38

The Gourt made the following: ORDER

¶39

HoNB.,fr: Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMAT.A'.\HA

¶40

WRIT PETITION No.6530 of :?02:)

¶41

ORDER

¶42

Th s V'r t Petirion is fi1ed seekng [he following substanti",e r'^.lief:-

¶43

io tsslre ct Wit or order in the noture oJ' n W.it o.f MontT,lrnu s declarin.g the ctction of the 4tn re:4tc td_e,nt in not c)rLsl Te ing representation dated. 09/0l?,,1)023 for accep1ir,..J tir,e sale deed presented by tl.e pelitLonctr for reqistraLic t of Plot beanng No.2S4, admetsur ry 2C,O Sc1 Yards irL .JrLruea No.221 situated at Abtlu apu, V llaget Abdulicryu 'nlet Reuenue Mandal, Ranga Red,Cy Di:;tict Telor,,oanc fitate, ln fauour of Smt A Naueena ]{ttntan D/ct A V<,e'ro St.uctmg as illegat, arbitrary and ;:_tioi ttit e of prtnc'ple:s tJ'ntLtural justice and consequen,.lA, to a,;lect the, lth tespo tclerLt to recetue and register the :;a,e jeed docurnett tresented bg him in respect of cboue s Lid. lanti ond rel.ee.s t he sante in the interest of justice."

¶44

Sri N{osl r: I{arpu. learned counsel f cr tt.e petitioner, seeks pernriss on to withdrarv the writ petition .u rh a ribertv to file a fresh < ne

¶45

3 No rnar-e; ii l is brought to the notice of this rlr Llr, t.o hold that there I s any orcler abstaining the petition,:r liom withdrau,rng r i-r,: Writ petition. Therefore, per.n.iss,ion, as pral.ed for. is; : :r:ordecl

¶46

¶47

¶48

Dr CSL,) W.^D.No.6530 of 2023

¶49

The Writ Petition is dismissed^{as withdrar.t'n grating} liberty subject to the Rules^{and Regulationsapplicable} No

¶50

order as to costs.

¶51

5 As a sequel. pending^{miscellaneous applications,if any,}

¶52

shall stand closed

¶53

/ITRUE COPY//

¶54

SD/. V. KAVITHA ASSISTANIREGISTRAR L7g,

¶55

SECTION OFFICER

¶56

To'1. One CC to SRI MOSHE MARPU, Advocate tOi^U-ql^, i o;; cc io SRt^{E MARUTHIRAJ&} {dyq9?!-e-t9f.tlcl 3. Two ccs to GP^{FoR siAlvii''s ANb'iEclsiiArtoru', Hish court for the} State of Telangana. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies BN LSJ\V

¶57

HIGH COURT'

¶58

DATE D : 1 3l0i' l',2023

¶59

ORPER

¶60

Ii o
,( <br>/, 7.:,
I
' t h\lt N8

¶61

WP.No.6530 of 2023

¶62

DISMISSING I'HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDR,\WN WITHOUT CI)STS

¶63

( .\V ri
,)
5

Sri. Rachuri Shankar alias Shiva Shankar v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Rachuri Shankar alias Shiva Shankar v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mir Asad Ali Khan Vs The State of Telangana

M.Arougya Raju Vs The Telangana State Waqf Board

Mohammed Mukram Pasha Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Komuravelli Murali Vs The State of Telangana

Avula Rajamouli Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Synycs Sabu LLP. Vs State of Telangana