Allowed

Infosage Systems India Private Limited v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Telangana HC23 Jan 2023WP/613/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a mandamus to provide an electricity connection without insisting on an occupancy certificate. The Court allowed the plea by relying on a previous order in W.P.No.45829 of 2022, directing respondents to provide power subject to undertaking conditions.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to provide electricity connection subject to undertaking to produce occupancy certificate within a prescribed period.

Infosage Systems India Private Limited Vs The… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[32re I

¶2

HIGI{ COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD

¶3

(Spccia[ Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P,MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 6l 3 0F 2023

¶6

Betrvecn:

¶7

Infosage Systems India Private Limited, Rep by Rajendra Prasad Shanna S/o. Madan Lal Sharma, Occ. Business Uo. PIot No.8, Sy.No.34 and 35 Dwarakadas Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, Secunderabad, Begumpet.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

l. The Southem Power Distribution Company ofTelangana State Ltd, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director having its Corporate office at 6- I -50, Mint Conrpound, Hyderabad 500063.

¶11

The Superintending Engineer, Operation Banjara Hills Circl€, T S S P D C L, C.T.S. Colony, Yousufguda, Hyderabad-45.

¶12

The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (Comrnl) Operation Creen Lands Sub-Division, T S S P D C L, G.T.S. Colony, Yousufguda, Hyderabad-45.

¶13

The Assistant Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD North AE Begumpet 3 TSSPDCL Hyderabad.

¶14

The Greatcr Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by the Cornmissioner, Near ' Tank Burid, Hyderabad

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue it a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents I to 4 to provide electricity connection to the residential building, the Plot No.8 in Survey Nos.34 and 35, admeasuring 266.66 Sq.yds., Municipal Ward No. I Block No.10, Situated at Dwarakadas, Co-operativc Housing Society Ltd, Begumpet, Secunderabad, and bounded by North: Plot No.9; South: Plot No. 7; East: 30 ft.wide road; West: Plot No.l4. Without insisting upon occupancy Certificate frorn the 5ih respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electricity connection to the above referred premises as illegal and arbitrary;

¶17

IA NO: I OF 202

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC pralng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be plcased to direct^the respondents t to 4 to provide electricity connection to thc residential building, the Plot No.S, in Survey Nos. 34 and 35, admeasuring 266.66 Sq.yds., Municipal^WardNo.l, Block No.l0, Situated at Dwarakadas Co-operative^{HousingSociety Ltd, Begumpet,} Secunderabatl, and bounded by North:^Plot No.^{9; South: PIot No. 7; East:30 ft'rvideroad;} West: Plot No.l4. Without insisting upon^{occupancycertificate from5th respondent}

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioncr : SRI. THAKUR ROOPA SINGII Counscl for thc Respondents : R VINOD REDDY(SC^{FORTSTRANSCO)} The Court madc thc follorving

¶20

I \

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SMT.JUSTICE^{P.MADHAVI DEVI} W.P.NO. 6L3 0F 2023

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Writ Petition is {iled for the following reliel-

¶24

"...Wit of Mandamus directing the respondents No.l to 4 to prouide electicity annection to the residenti<tl building, the Plot No.8 in Surueg Nos.34 and 35, admeasuring 266.66 Sq.yds., Municipal Ward. No.1, Block No.lO, Situated at Dwarakados Cooperatiue Housing Society Ltd, Begumpet, Secunderabad and bounded bg North Plot No.9, South Plot No.7, F,ast 3O fi.utide^{road,West Plot No.14 Wthout insbting upon} occltpancA Certiftcate from the 5* respond.ent bg holding that the refusat to prouide electicitg connection to the aboue rekrred premises, as illegal and arbitrary and to pass..."

¶25

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the lis in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 23.L2.2O22 in W.P.No.45829 of 2022 and, t}:e same is not disputed by the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶26

In view of the same and for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order d,ated 23.12.2022 passed in W.P.No.45B29 of 2022, directirtg the respondents to provide the power supply to the prernises of the petitioner

¶27

subject to the compiiance of terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupaxcy certificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occuparcy certificate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶28

The olfice is directed to append a copy of the order dated 23.12.2022 passed in W.p.No.4S829 of 2022 to triis Writ^petition.

¶29

Misccllaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Pelilioqr _s!4lf .gtaqd closed.- T[91e gh-a]l _b-9 .ro: order as to

¶30

costs

¶31

SD/-N.CHANDITA SHEKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

x I

i/TRUE COPY//

SECTIO OFFICER

To, L The Chairman and Managing Director, Southem Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd, having its Corporate offrce at 6-1-50, Mint Compound, Hyderabad 500063.

¶36

The Superintending Engineer, Operation Banjara Hills Circle, T S S P D C L, G.T.S. Colony, Yousufguda, Hyderabad-45.

¶37

The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (Comml) Operation Green Lands Sub-Division, T S S P D C L, G.T.S. Colony, Yousufgud4^{Hyderabad-45.}

¶38

The Assistant Engineer,^{SE/OP/GHYD NorthAE Begumpet 3 TSSPDCLHyderabad}

¶39

The Commissioner,^{Greater HyderabadMunicipal Corporation, Near Tank Bund,} Hyderabad

¶40

One CC to SRI. THAKUR^{ROOPA SINGH Advocate} [OPUC]

¶41

One CC to SRI.^{R VINODREDDY(SCFORTSTRANSCO)Advocate [OPUC]}

¶42

Two^{CD CoPies}

HIGII COURT

PMDJ

DATED:23101/2023

ORDER

ErAtE
I
F*
rrs NII E
i:
I
t(i t\ *
\Q,,
i DrsPll

¶48

WP.No.6l3 of 2023

¶49

WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF WITHOUT CoSTS

Infosage Systems India Private Limited v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Infosage Systems India Private Limited v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Animisha Muppidi Reddy Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary

Smt. Asama Khatun Vs The State of Telangana

Mandadapu Ramakrishna Vs The Government of A.P.

M/s Sai Ramana Metal Industries Vs State of Telangana

Shri Vaddepally Srishailam Vs Shri Nukala Raghuaveer Reddy

Naveen Associates Vs The State of Telangana