The Hon'ble High Court of Telangana held the writ petition inflectuous upon acceptance of submission that the project was completed and a subsequent petition for compensation was pending.
Writ petition closed as infructuous with liberty to pursue W.P. No.4257 of 2016 for compensation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
'-' i1 [3219 ]
HIGH COURTFORTHE ST6TE OF-TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ' -' (Special'brigina[9urigdiction)
FRIDAY, THETWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMTJUSTICEP. MADHAVIDEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 28067 0F 2013
Between:
ANO
..:RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitutionof lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court may be pleased to issue writor direction preferably writ of mandamus declaringthe action of the respondentsin not taking appropriate action on the obiection/representation
dated 22-4-2013subr littec by the petitioners againstthe changeo' alignmentand including theirlandsin the proposed Ayacutof Anicut on \/" ra River near Jalimudi(v)Madhira(t\l) of Khammam Distrlctwhich are already lrrder the Ayacut of existingLift lrriga.ion schemes and regular tanks' as illegzrl arbitraryand violative ofprtnciples lf natural Justiceand consequentlydlrect tl tl respondentsto conductjoint inspecti ln and survey in the presence of all the parl'ies andtakea decision byconsideritg the objectrons of the petitioners'
l.A. NO: 1 OF20'13(IA PMP. NO:34849 0F 2013)
PetitionUndersectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircuIIs;tancesstatedin the affidavitfiledrn sr pport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondentsto consider the objection/representationsubmitiedby the petitioners on 22'4-2)13rn parishkruthi before proceedings wittr the :onstruction of canalsin respeclof "Anicut on wyra river nearJalrmudi(v) Madhira(M) of Khammam District',p ending the dlsposalof writ petition
Counsel forthe Peti ioner: SRl. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR
counser forthe Res )ondent Nos'1 to 4: GP FoR'Tl?1ti"=T,jl.IlNL?o*o
Counsel forthe Res )ondent No.5: GP FOR REVENUE
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
t t
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE.P.MADHAVI DEVI
W.P.No. 28o,67 of 2013
ORDER:
In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for change of alignment of thc proposed prcjcr:t on Wyra Iliver near Jalimud_i (V), Madhira (M) of Khammam Disrrict.
2
. PMD'J W I'.lto.2aO57of 2013
Misccllr Lneouspetitions, ifany, ' pcn<ling i:this writ
petition, shalstand closed
sDr-P'cHNr\ 3AB, EjlsHSA
/,TRUECOPY'/
SEOTIOIJbFFICER
CHR
BS
q
HIGH COUR']'
DATED:2010' 12023
ORDER
W.P.No.280(i7 of 2013
CLOSING THE WRITPETITION WITHOUT(;OSTS
&Tu
crrt \d2a3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the proposed change in alignment of the project on the Wyra River rendered the current petition infructuous.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to liberty to pursue a separate writ petition filed for compensation.
Mandadapu Ramakrishna and others
Government of A P
Justice P. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
