The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an administrative memo under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution as the petitioner had failed to appear or offer representation on multiple occasions.
No order as to costs; Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO:57 76 0F 2010
Between:
Mohd., Zaheer, S/o. Mohd. Hussain , aged 48 years, Watchman, Office of the B.oard .for. Ayurveda and Homeopathy, Government of A.p. eutbiguda, Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the Memo No. 154/Bds/'l 0 dt. 16-2-2010 issued by the'1st respondent as not only void and withoutjurisdiction but also arbitrary illegal, malafide violating Articles'14, '16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and set aside the same
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010 (WPMP. NO: 7441 OF 2010)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Memo NO.'1 54/Bds/10 dl. 16-2-2010 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the writ petition
l.A. NO: 1OF 2012(WPMP. NO:21738OF20121
Petition under section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the Highcourtmay be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 toimplement theproceedingsNO' 168/ADMN.1/201O dt.29.1.2010by fixing a time limit with revision of pay to the post of Watchman
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI M. SALEEM
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1:SRI A. K. JAYAPRAKASH RAO
Counsel for the RespondentNo.2: GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILYWELFARE
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICENAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.576OF 2010
ORDER:
On several occasions,there was no representationon
behalf of the petitioner.Even today, there is no representation
on behalf ofthe Petitioner'
2 Having regard to the above,this Court is of the
opinion thatthe petitioneris not interestedto pursuethe present writ Petition.
non-prosecution.No order as to costs.
As a sequel,miscellaneousapplicationspending rt any,
in this WritPetition, shall stand closed.
//rRUE coPY//
\
secrKrrrcen
To, 1 Two CCs toGP FOR MED HEALTHAND'FAMILY WELFARE 'High Courtfor 2 J Hlf $"f'$$lFlsii,J#ffi#3hl*'rxjkl"",,eropUcl 4. TwoCD CoPies BM \ - GJPI >Rz-
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011012023
ORDER
WP.No.5776 ot 2010
.4.i' ,.-a:.-, rir-- S i;
( .\r
1E F t 'J
la
.'.:
* c')
.1)e s FA1',:{
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
s
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohd., Zaheer
The Andhra Board for Ayurveda and Homeopathy, Rep. by its Registrar
The Commissioner, Deptt., of Ayush, Government of A.P.
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
