In WP No. 19363 of 2011, the High Court of Telangana, in light of interim orders passed on 22.09.2011, closed the writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 16.06.2011 without making any further substantive orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19363 OF 2011
Between:
Prof.V. Jagadeeshwar Rao, S/o.Mr. V.P.Rao, aged 46 years, Occ : Service, R/o.C66, Ravindra Nagar Colony, Hubsiguda, Service Rl/o C-66, Hyderabad-
.....PETITIONER
AND
(R- 4 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 23-08-2O11)
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying lhat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned orders No.307113212011/Adm.lll dated 16-06-201 1 issued by the 1"t Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, void abinitio, without jurisdiction, issued without application of mind, malafide and contrary to the UGC guidelines for media centre and violative of the Petitioners fundamental rights ggaranteed under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and to j set aside the same with all consequential benefits.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2011(WPMP . NO: 23392 OF 2011)
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned orders No.307113212011/Adm.lll dated: 16.06.2011 issued by the 1't Respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI GANDRA MOHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : ---
The Court made the following ORDER
I i
-_i
THE H ON' BtE SRI JUST ICE N AGESH B HEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.1 9363 of 20Lt
The petitioner challenges the order No.3O7 /732/201,1/Adm.l| dated 16.06.2011 passed by the 1,t respondent_Chairman, BOM, EMMRC & Vice Chancellor, Osmania University.
Heard
ln view of the interim orders passed by this Court on
22.09.201,L, no further orders are required in this writ petition
Hence, the writ petition is closed. lnterlocutory applications if
any pending in this writ petition shall also stand closed. No order as to
costs
SD/.B. SARASWATHI ASSISTANT REGISIRAR //TRUE COPY// sEcfloN odtcea
To I 313 33 3 3Jl ss!s;?ge!.:" F"e'Advocate topucl e fw. c6;o,",;:"'o^ ohattacharjee' Advocaie toPtjcl
SA GJP Srrq.
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011012023
ORDER
WP.No.19363 of 2011
1$ +- STAiq o
/!
1l' Nt! ? Ui3 ,5o
*
'l/-
Di'5;'r;l ''^,
CLOSING THE W.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
c +\ \ \ a-9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prof. V. Jagadeeshwar Rao
The Educational Multimedia Research Centre, Osmania University
The Registrar, Osmania University
Prof. D.N. Reddy
Sri K.H. Rao
Nagesh Beemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
