The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition after being confirmed in the shop as a nominee. The High Court recorded permission for the withdrawal and dismissed the suit accordingly.
Permission recorded for withdrawal; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t321e I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5288 OF 2023
Between:
AND
...*aTTONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one. in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the Letter No. LC / 785 ( WP 01) /2023-RM-ADB, dated 3O.O1.2023 of the 2nd respondent in rejecting the extension of the petitioners shops license period of 1st Petitioner Shop No. 2, 2nd petitioner Shop No. 3 and 3rd petitioner Shop No. 4 respectively situaled at Nirmal Bus Station, Nirmal. District is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the circulars and as well aS the blatant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of lndia set- aside the same consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioners upto 30.03-2024 from the above sald shops lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents continue the 1st Petitioner Shop No. 2, 2nd petitioner Shop No.3 and 3rd petitioner Shop No.4 respectively situated at Nirmal Bus Station, Nirmal District by suspending the Letter No. LC / 785 (WP 01 ) 12023RM-ADB, dated 30.01.2023 of the 2nd respondent forthwith pending disposal of the main writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. A .JAGAN
Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. A. SRINIVAS REDDY(SC FOR TSRTC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HC N'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
I IRIT PETITION No.5288 of 2o23
ORDER
Learnerl cc unsel f,tr the petrtioner seeks ;.rertnission to withdrari, thi:,, r'ri - l)etition as the nominee of the petiliorLer is being continlred in rhr: r u [rjr:ct shops.
There shall br: no rrder as to costs
closed
//TRUE COPY//
SD,'. V. KAVITHA ASSts;r,?sEGtsrRAR / S[:CTiON OFFICER
To,
BM
Sw
,sE-
HIGH COIJITT
DATED:241 1412023
ORDER
WP.No.528t of 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHI)UT'COSTS
,,r-:il.M
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as the nominee is continuing in the shops.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
D. Chakradhar
D. Naresh
P. Satish
Telangana State Road Transport Corporation
The Regional Manager, TSRTC, Adilabad Region
The Depot Manager, TSRTC Nirmal Depot
P. MADHAVI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
