Petitioner filed a contempt case alleging willful disobedience of interim orders. The petitioner submitted that the underlying writ case was settled and both original parties appeared. The High Court allowed the petition and closed the contempt proceedings accordingly.
Contempt Case No. 958 of 2022 closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 958 OF 2022
Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, to summon & punish the respondents herein for willfully disobeying the Orders of the High Court daled81312022 passed in lA No.1 of 2022 inWP No.1801 of 2OZ2
Between
l,4d. Amair, S/o. IMd. tt/ehraj, Aged about 25 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.H.No.21-229116, Ganesh Market, Lad Bazar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'.NDENTS
For the Petitioner : SRI SYED MUSTAFA QUADRI, Advocate
For the Respondent No.6 : SRI B.SRINARAYANA, Advocate
For the Respondent No.7 : SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE) } ON'BLE SMT. JUSTICEP.MADHAVI DEVI
co NTEMPT CASE No.958 of2022
ORDER
Tltc Contem rt Case is filed seel<ingpttllislLm'nt tc tlle l'c-spotlclcnts unclcr Section.'; I I to 12 of theConlempt of Coul'ts Acl, I9 7I lor- u'ilful disobedier-rcc c,f he interim ordcrs of thisCour tla.t ci 08.03'2022 in LA.No. I ol 2Ol|2 in W.P.No.180 I r';l 2022aud to pitss st rch oLhcr order or orcltrs.
). Le:rlncd :ounsel for the pctitioner sltlrn itt,:cl ll llt thc.)rescnt Contcrnpt(las3 ' ,as filed for non-compliancc oi tltt' itr r'rttlt orrl:l-cl:rted 08.0.1.2023 in \ '.I).No.180 | of 2022 and thc V'ri1 P l Lto r ll:'ts sitlce been alkxved, l1-r Oontempt Case rnay bc closr:tl.
Miscel:al eous applications, il 2p1, 1lctrrlittg,s; titll aististand
c:losed. S;d,-I,NIAGALAKSHMI iEi'ulv REGISTRAR //TRUEcoPY/l { l:iECTIONOFFICER
To
nd a'pUCl i Ef ffi [ ]ilsi'#:##'H.ff##i'?,ffiYll::;':' 5 TwoCDC(lP ls
K1 ff-
HIGH COURT
DATED:21104120'.23
L<br>=
I
-
ORDER
CC.No.958 ol 2O2t2
CLOSING THE C(].
-) It,.t'1 <sup>rg , iiil''
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ld. Amair
Arvind Kumar
Lokesh Kumar
Ashok Samrat
Surya Kumar
Maujula Singh
P. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
