Routhu Veeraswamy, v. The Prl. Secretery
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged the Tahasildar's failure to consider a representation regarding the illegal demolition of their compound wall, claiming violations of due process. The court reviewed the record and the respondent's written instructions finding the construction encroached on vacant land and ordered the petition closed.
What did the court decide?
Closed the writ petition and ordered the stricking off of any allied miscellaneous petitions.
What the court decided
[3168 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 4841 OF 2023
Between:
- 'l . Routhu Veeraswamy, S/o R.Rajaiah, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Rtd Employee, R/o. Kabeer Nagar, Borabanda, Hyderabad 45
- Jennaram Ramesh, S/o. Rama Chandram, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Employee. Rl/o. H.No.13-6-480/1, Jaffergadda, Karwan Asif Nagar, Kulsumpura, Hyderabad-67
- Govind Ram, S/o. Joga Ramji Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business, R:/o. 4- 593, Marwadi Lane, Balaji Nagar, Jawahar Nagar, Kapra Mandal, Medchal/Malkajgir Dist87 rep their GPA Holder K.Renu Kumar, S/o. K.Shanker Aged about 47 yearc, Occ. Business,Ryo.l -'188, Jyothi Colony, Jawahar Nagar Municipality, Kapra Mandal, Medchal/Malkajgjiri District-87
...PETITIONERS
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
'l. Routhu Veeraswamy, Jennaram Ramesh, Govind Ram
- respondent
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary
- respondent
The Tahasildar, Kapra Mandal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/4841/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court