Disposed

Dhanisetti Anjaneyulu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Feb 2023WP/46567/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition seeking a stay on an order. It directed the respondent to dispose of a related statutory appeal within three months, pending which a status quo was maintained regarding the subject property.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to dispose of appeal CMA No.7/2022 within three months; parties directed to maintain status quo in subject property pending disposal.

Dhanisetti Anjaneyulu Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.46567 OF 2022

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not granting stay of operation of order vide Case No.A/35/ LTR/WZD/2022, dated 27.09.2022 passed by respondent No.3 during the pendency of C.M.A. No.7 of 2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles of 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India besides violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to grant stay of operation of the said order passed by the respondent No.3 pending disposal of CMA No.7 of 2022.

¶5

Heard Sri Krishna Kishore Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Sri Ajay Kumar Madisetty, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.5.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.5 submits that without going into the merits of the case the writ

¶7

¶8

petition may be disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to dispose of the appeal CMA No.7 of 2022 filed by the petitioner by fixing time limit and till such time the parties may be directed to maintain status quo in respect of subject property.

¶9

In view of the submissions made by the respective parties writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to dispose of the appeal in CMA No.7 of 2022 after giving opportunity to the parties in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Till such time, both the parties are directed to maintain Status Quo.

¶10

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶11

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶12

______________________________ JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶13

06^th February, 2023 Skj

¶14

¶15

¶16

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶17

WRIT PETITION No.46567 OF 2022

¶18

Date : 06-02-2023

¶19

Skj

Dhanisetti Anjaneyulu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhanisetti Anjaneyulu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Chandra Bhanu Rao, Vs B.Shafiullah

Fishermen Cooperative Society, Karimnagar Dist. Vs Bojja Narayana, Karimnagar Dist. and Another

M/s. Sai Anjali Engineering Enterprises, Vs Smt. B.Udaya Lakshmi, IAS

Goka Laxma Reddy Vs The Revisional Authority under Apsaltr cum the Secretary

Hanmakonda Ramesh Vs The State of Telangana

Shyamala Krishna Reddy, Khammam Dist., and 4 Otrs. Vs the Govt.of a.P.,Rep.by Prl.Secretary,Forest,Hyd.,and 5 Otrs.