Bolagani. Venkata Raghavendra Rao v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition challenging the indefinite seizure of immovable property, the petitioners contended that the impugned letter was illegal and arbitrary. The Court closed the writ petition as the respondents had revoked the impugned letter, resolving the grievance.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed as the grievance had been resolved by the revocation of the impugned letter.