Petitioners challenged a government order introducing contiguous district cadres for recruitment, alleging arbitrariness and violation of constitutional rights. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without costs.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3368 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 1898 50F 2023
Between
'.PCMain Marks.110,Event Marks. 70
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Oder or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned by the G.O.Ms.No. 46, General Administration (SPF.Il ) Department, dated 04-04-2022 issued by the'l st Respondent in applying the Telangana Public Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment), Order, 20'18 by creating Contiguous District Cadre and stating that the Appointing Authority may appoint them in any Battalion in the concerned Contiguous District cadre after selection in Note-2 of para 28 of the notification for the post of SCT PC TSSP - pursuant to Notification No. Rc No. 41lRect./Admn.112022 Date.25.04.2022 issued by the 2nd Respondent as discriminatory, improper, unjust, illegal, arbitrary, and violative of fundamental rights of the petitioners guaranteed under Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently
a. set, aside the G.O.Ms.No. 46, General Administration (SPF.ll ) Department, dated 04-04-2022 to the extent of TSSP of Annexure-l and Table 6 of Annexure-ll of Contiguous District Cadre.
b.Also set aside Note-2 of para 28 of Notification No. Rc No 4 1 /Rect./Ad mn .1 I 2022 Dale. 25.O4.2O22.
c.Direct the respondents to NOT to apply Contiguous District Cadre in the recruitment of SCT PC TSSP and instead direct them to follow the same process followed till 2018.
d. Grant Stay on further selection processes of recruitment process to the extent of the post of SCT PC TSSPpursuant to notification Notification No. Rc No. 4'l /Rect./Admn .1 12022 Date. 25.0 4.2022.
lA NO:'l OF 2023
Petition under Section 1 5'l CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed.in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the G.O.Ms.No. 46, General Administration(SPF.ll ) Department, dated
04-04-2022 to the extent of TSSP of Annexure-l and Table 6 ofAnnexure-ll of Contiguous District Cadre and Also suspend Note-2 ofpara 28 ofNotification No. Rc No. 41 /Recl. I Admn. 1 I 2022 Date. 25.04.2022.
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Cou(may be pleasedto Direct the respondents to NOT to apply Contiguous District Cadrein the recruitment of SCT PC TSSP and instead direct them to follow the sameprocess followedtill 2018.
lA NO: 3 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court maY bepleased toGrant STAY, on further selectionprocesses of recruitmentprocessto theextentof the j post of SCT PC TSSP pursuant to notification Notification No. Rc No. 41 /Rect./Admn .1 12022 Date. 25.O4.2022.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. RAMESH CHILLA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5: AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
ll
cE
r HEHoN'BLE l,tf i8lr["r?#f;i.iusrl
THEHON,BLESRI JUSTICE $iI?AVARAPU RAJESIIWARRAO
\V.P.No.18985OF 2023
OR RT ()etttteHott'bteth ActingChieJ Jtttite Abhinaatl Kttnar Shatili)
IramedcourrselapPearingforthepetitionenseek permissionof this C-ourt to withdrawthe writ petition withliberry to the petitioners to file writ petitionafrest5
if necessary.
Reservingsuch libercy,the \X/rit Petition IS
dismissedas withdrawn'
Miscellaneouspetitions, if *y, pendingshall stand
closed.
D/. MOHD.SANAULLAHANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRA //TRUECOPY// SECTI N OFFICER
SB GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:19 tO7t2O23
iE SIA rT
'' I
cr 16 [lJB2m -:. <br>i ,l
Filti(;{
ORDER
WP.No.18985 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
AD<br>0B\ ?'3
Chimata Karunakar
Mandava Haressh
Byndla Vivekgoutham
Chennaram Mahipal
Suddula Raghavender
Todusu Venkanna
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
