High Court at Hyderabad considered a writ petition seeking appointment as Forest Beat Officer or Junior Assistant. Counsel submitted the cause did not survive, leading the court to dismiss the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTYFIFTH DAY OF SEPTENTBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVASRAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 42121OF 2017
Between:
Sameena, D/o. Najeemunnisa,Sister of Late M.A.Ra-heem,Agedabout 28 years, Unemploye6, R/o. H.No.6-3-109, Khanpura,Karimngar,Karimnagar District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction moreparticularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaringthe action of the respondentsin not considering the case ofpetitioner for appointment asForest BeatOfficer or Junior Assistant by taking into consideration ofthe representationdated 09-08-2017 of thepetitioner, vide proceedingsRc.No. 4385/5212012'dated 23-11-2015 issued by the 1"t respondent asillegal,properand violative of principles of natural justice under Articles 14, 16 and 19 of the Constitutionof lndia and consequently direct therespondentsherein to appoint the petitioner as Forest Beat Officer or Junior Assistant bytakinginto considerationof the
representation of the petitioner dated 09-0g-2017 and also proceedings Rc-No.4385/52 12012, dated Z3-11'2015 issued by the 1.r respondent
l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(WPMP. NO:52 241 0F 20171
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to the direct the respondents herein to appoint the petitioner as Forest Beat officer or Junior Assistant etc., in the Bhoopalpally Range pending disposal of the above writ petition, as otherwise the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and hardship.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.MALAHAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES-I
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.42L2L of 2OL7
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri A. Malahar Rao, learned counsel for thepetitioner submits that the cause in the writpetition does not survive for adjudication.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. K.SREERAMA MUR/rHY ASSISTANT REGISIRAR / sEcfloN &ffrce*
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2510912023
ORDER
WP.No.42121 of 2017
, ',\lq,t; v
,', ,i
tt lJ r.l:.{\ ;'"
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
Sameena
The Divisional Forest Officer, Karimnagar East Division
The District Collector, Karimnagar
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Govt. of Telangana
The State of Telangana
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
