The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a forest tender for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel during hearings.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No:41ffiO OF 2022
Between:
M/s. Sri Sai Srinivasa Agencies, Rep. by its Prop. V.Satyanarayana S/o Radhakrishna Murthy, Aged 50 years, No 7-3-3471114, Plot No. 94 Sai Raghava Residency, Vljaya Nagar Colony-3 Khanapuram Haveli, Khammam Urban, Khammam District.
..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased Sto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 4th respondent in issuing the impugned order bearing Rc.No. 1092/20'1 7/A5 dt. 141912022 cancelling the tender pertaining to the Sale of Eucalyptus Pulpwood (without bark) despite the petitioner offered highest rate, after lapse of about 9 months from the date of finalization of the tender i.e., dt. 181112022 on the ground that the tender rate was not satisfactory, as being illegal, arbitrary, unilateral and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same.
/
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order bearing Rc.No.'1092/20171A5 dl. 141912022 issued by the 4th respondent herein, while issuing the work order to the petitioner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for.the Petitioner: SRI KARUNAKAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following: ORDER
--7|
I I
\
1
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.4168O of 2o22
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing on25.04.2023,there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner in morningsession and also in the afternoon session. To give one more opportunity tothe petitioner, the matter was posted on 26.04.2023 under the caption "for dismissa["
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANTREGSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEb TI R
To ,t 2 fls 33ii":$ffi|5$S€:Bo'nI'3"ti?3liJ331"?Jof re ansana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3 Two CD Copies PSK. SB q
HIGH COURT
DATED:2610412023
ORDER
WP.No.41680 of 2022
1
,/ ., i) ,_-i,
/.
lr C 5 Ji;il 2[23
\r
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS. Gf-|d 9<>-'qAsPl
M/s. Sri Sai Srinivasa Agencies
State of Telangana
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
