Dismissed

Vankdothu Sugunamma, Khammam District and 5 Others v. Dist. Conservator of Forest, Khammam District and 2 Others

Telangana HC25 Apr 2023WP/19055/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition No.19055 of 2013 filed by landowners challenging forest department's interference with cultivation was dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners failed to appear despite multiple posts.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted no relief; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.

What the court decided

Vankdothu Sugunamma, Khammam District and 5… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY oF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 19055 OF 2013

¶8

Between:

¶9

1 Vankdothu Sugunamm.a, W9 Balu, Aged 60 years, Occ: Agrl, R/o. Satyanarayanapuram Nellipaka Revenue village, Aswapuram^-Mandal, Khammam District.

¶10

2 Gugulothu Laxmi, Wo. Venkanna, aged 40 years, Occ. Agral, Rt/o. Satyanarayanapuram, Nellipaka Revenue Villaje, Aswapuram- Mandal, Khammam District.

¶11

J Banothu Bhingya, S/o. Rupla, aged 60' years, Occ. Agri, R/o. 9atyanarayanapuram,^{NellipakaRevenue villa!e, Aswapuram - Mandal,} Khammam District.

¶12

4 Vankdothu Davao, S/o. Balu, _ aged 46 years, Occ. Agri, R/o_ 9atyanarayanapuram,^{NellipakaRev-enue villa-ge, Aswapuram-Mandal,} Khammam District.

¶13

5 Daravathu Bhadramma, Wo. Balaji, agei 36 years, Occ. Agri, R:io. Satyanarayanapuram, Nellipaka Rdvenu-e village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District.

¶14

6 Vankdothu Kanthamma, Wo. Chinabhadru Aged SO years, Occ. Agri, Ri/o. Satyanarayanapuram Nellipaka Revenue village, Aswapuram^-Mindal, Khammam District.

¶15

...PETITIONERS

¶16

ANO

¶17

The Diskict Conservator of Forest, Khammarn District, Khammam Andhra Pradesh.

¶18

Divisional Forest Officer, Palvoncha Devision, Palvoncha, Khammam District.

¶19

Forest Ranger, Aswapuram beat Area, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam

¶20

. District.

¶21

Govt. of A.P. rep. by its Spl. Chief Secretary, Forest Dept., Secretariat, Hyd.

¶22

(R4 is impleaded as per Court Order dt. 9-7-13 in WP.M?.24242 ol 2013)

¶23

...RESPONDENTS

¶24

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus by declaring that the 'action of the respondents not permitting the

¶25

¶26

petitioners to cultivate their lands is illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and direct the respondents not to rnterfere with the lands of the petitioners in sy. No.190, 190/37, 190134t1, 19Ot3Z 1got33t1, 1got33t2 of Ne ipaka Revenue Village, Aswapurarfi Mandal, Khamrnam District admeasuring in total Ac. 6.33 gts without conducting joint survey along with revenue department and without asserting that the land belongs to revenue or forest department.

¶27

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WP MP. NO: 23297 OF 20131

¶28

Petition under Section 1 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners cultivating activities and not to initiate any criminal proceedings for cultivating the land admeasuring Ac. 6.33 gts in Sy No. 190, 190/37, 19013411 , 150t32, 19Ot3311 , 190t3312 of Neilipaka Revenue Village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District durin'g pending of the main writ petition in the interest of Justice.

¶29

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 24241 oF 2013)

¶30

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file the pattadar pass books as additional material papers on behalf of the petitioners herein in the interest of justice.

¶31

l.A NO:4 OF 2013(WPMP, NO: 44017 0F 20131

¶32

Between:

¶33

Vankdothu Sugunamma, Wo. Balu, Aged 60 years, Occ: Agrl, R/o. Satyanarayanapuram Nellipaka Revenue village, Aswapuram^-Mbndal, Khammam District.

¶34

2 Gugulothu Laxmi, Wo. Venkanna, aged 40 years, Occ. Agral, R:/o. Satyanarayanapuram, Nellipaka Revenle Villale, Aswapuram- Mbndal, Khammam District.

¶35

J Banothu Bhingya, S/o. Rupla, aged 60 years, Occ. Agri, Ryo. Satyanarayanapuram, Nellipaka Revenue village, Aswapuram-[,iandal, Khammam District.

¶36

4 Vankdothu Davao, S/o. Balu, _ aged 46 years, Occ. Agri, Rl/o. Satyanarayanapuram, Nellipaka Reienue village, Aswapuram"Mandal, Khammam District.

¶37

5 Daravathu Bhadramma, Wo. Balaji, aged 36 years, Occ. Agri, R/o. Satyanarayanapuram, Nellipaka Revenrie villagd, Aswapuram^"Mandal, Khammam District.

¶38

6 Vankdothu Kanthamma, Wo..Chinabhadru Aged 50 years, Occ_ Agri, R/o. ?atyanarayanapuram^{Nellipaka Revenueviltage, Aswapuramfildndal,} Khamrnam District.

¶39

...PETITIONERS/PETITION ERS

¶40

AND

¶41

The District Conservator of Forest, Khammam District, Khammam Andhra Pradesh.

¶42

Divisional Forest Officer, Palvoncha Devision, palvoncha, Khammam District.

¶43

Forest Rang_qr, Aswapuram beat Area, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District.

¶44

Govt. of A.P. rep. by its Spl. Chief Secretary, Forest Dept., Secretariat, Hvd.

¶45

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶46

The District Collector, Khammam District at Khammam.

¶47

The Revenue Divisional Officer, palavoncha Division, khammam District at^palavoncha.

¶48

The Tahsildar, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District.

¶49

...PROPOSED RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 5 TO 7

¶50

Petition under section^'r51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased impread the proposed respondents as respondents 5 to 7 in w.p.No. 19055 oF 2013 in the interest of justice.

¶51

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M.p.V.N.V.SASTRI Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR FORESTS

¶52

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶53

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶54

WRIT PETITION No.19O55 of 2O13

¶55

ORDER

¶56

Whr:n the matter $,as taken up for consideration on 2l -O2.'2023, there rv:rs no representation on behalf of the petitioners, to give one opportunity to the petitioners, the matter u,as posted to IO.O4.2023.

¶57

On lO.O4.2023, also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioncrs. To give final opportunity to the petitioners the matter was posted to 25.04.2023 under the caption for drsmissal'.

¶58

In sprte ol listrng the matter today under the caption for dismissall there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, it appears that the petitioners are not having interest to prosecute the matter.

¶59

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶60

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶61

Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

¶62

SD/-B. CHANDRA PRAKASH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 1^ --/ sEcflhq-oFFtcER

¶63

¶64

1 2 3 Ii$:f,1tirif*X.'$TTi;S'I3ffi PSK. sw r\v_

;J,1[y8L",,eansanaa,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2510412023

ORDER

WP.No.19055 of 2013

,$
<br>''
,t'!ii
,1<br>

¶71

DISMTSSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT^COSTS.

¶72

da-r;t'

Vankdothu Sugunamma, Khammam District and 5 Others v. Dist. Conservator of Forest, Khammam District and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Vankdothu Sugunamma, Khammam District and 5 Others v. Dist. Conservator of Forest, Khammam District and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sulgam Saidulu Vs The State of Telangana And 5 Others

Gandra Rama Devi Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Sirajul Arfeen Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Komaram Anil kumar and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Sri. Kannedari Vara Prasad, Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Bhavani Metals Vs The State of Telangana