Dismissed

Syed Sirajul Arfeen v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC24 Apr 2023WP/37390/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana, in a special original jurisdiction writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC, granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the petition seeking appointment as a Kazi over Wakf land. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Syed Sirajul Arfeen Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY ,THE TWENTY^{FOURTH DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYTHREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO}

¶6

WRIT PETITI o^{N NO: 37390 OF 2O2l}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sved Siraiul Arfeen. S/o Late Khaii^{Sayyad Zainulabiddin, aged about 46 years,} o6c Busin'ess, r/o village^{Ghotkuii,Mandal Tamsi,DstrictAdilabad, Presefltly} neiio-ing ai H.tlo.1-24,^{"Kailashnagar,Adilabadtown, District Adilabad'}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telanoana . represented^{by its Principal Secretaryto} Oor"inr"nt, Minoiities^{Weifare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad'} The District Collector,^{Adilabad, District Adilabad.}

¶12

3 The Tahsildar, Adilabad^{Urban Mandal, District Adilabad.} .

¶13

4 in" f"ranqrna State^{Wakf Board, rep by lts Chief Executive Officer,Hai} House buiiding,^Nampally, Hyderabad

¶14

...RES,ONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article^{226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiled therewith, the HighCourt may be} pleased to pass an order, or orders,^{directionor issuea writ moreparticularly} one in the name of^writ of^{Mandamus,directingthe respondentshereinto} consider the representation^{dated09-12-2021for appointingthe petitioneras} Kazi in respect of the^{land situated in Sy.lrlo.l33 to {he extent ot 1 acre37} guntasandSy.No,.l3Stoanextentof0'04guntassituatedatAdilabadUrban iittage, UanOil and District^{Adilabadwhich is lnam/Atiyatland, takinginto} through cons-ideration of report^{given by therespondentNo 2} Lr.No.F21234}12019 dated^{25-10-2021 addressedto the respondent No.1herein,} and consequently declare^{the action of the respondentsin not appointingthe} petitioner as Kazi in respect of the said^{property after death of his fatherKhaji} Sayyed Zainullabiddin

¶16

NO: 1 OF 20 1

¶17

Petition under Section¹ 51 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances stated} in the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition, the High Court may be pleased to} pass an order directing the respondents herein^{to considertherepresentation} dated O9-12-202'l for appointing^{the petitioneras Kazi in respectof the land} siluated in Sy.^{No. 1} 33 to the^{extent of 1 acre 37 guntasand Sy.No.1 38 to an} extent of 0.04^guntas situated^{at Adilabad Urbanvillage,Mandaland District}

¶18

¶19

Adilabad which is lnam/Atiyat^{land, pending disposalof main w.P.in the interest} of Justice.

¶20

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRl. S. CHANDRASEKHAR} counsel forthe^{RespondentsNo.lto3:GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE} Counsel for the^{RespondentsNo.4: SRl. MD. ABDUL MAFEEN QURESHI}

¶21

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶22

¶23

HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTI/AS RAO}

¶24

WRIT PETI^{TIONNo.37390 of 2O2L}

¶25

ORI)^ER:

¶26

When thc^{mattcr istaken up forconsideration' Sri S'} Chandra'^{Sekhar, lcarnedcounsel [or thc petitioncr submits} that he^{filcd a lcttcr on 2l 'O4'2O23 beforcthe registry secking} to posl^{thc mattcr undcr thc caption for lMithdrawl"so as ttr} enable^{him to withdraw thc samc and he sought pcrrnissionof} this Court^{to withdraw thc writ pctition}

¶27

Permission^{is accorded'} 3. AccordinglY,^{thc writ} Petition 1S dismissed^as

¶28

withdrawn

¶29

Misbcllancous^{applical-ions,pcnding if any'shall stand} closed.

¶30

SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISiANT^REGISTRAR

¶31

,TRUE^COPY//

¶32

secrro$66cen ]OCIAL^{WELFARE'High Courtfor the State of} "' ; l1?tgt:s?5rl'"6i^'ssJi;^{;';*'[eroPU cl}

ru$-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2410412023

ORDER

WP.No.37390 of 2021

HES 14 r4r
(o
0 6 rPr ztr!
Ua f\j.:i
* * j-
CHE o

¶40

DISMISSING OF THE PETITION

¶41

WITHOUT COSTS

¶42

0r**.r-P

Syed Sirajul Arfeen v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Sirajul Arfeen v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baddi Ramya Vs The Government of Telangana

Payyavula Komuramma Vs The State Of Telangana And 10 Others

Rayala Kondala Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Sulgam Saidulu Vs The State of Telangana And 5 Others

Gandra Rama Devi Vs The State of Telangana

Gurram Ashok Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others