A writ petition challenging illegal land mutation in favor of R5 without notice to class-I heirs was withdrawn by counsel for the petitioners following a settlement between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 37197 OF 2022
Between:
AND
...RES'.NDENTS/RES'.NDENT'
Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in effecting the mutation of the land admeasuring Ac.4-00 Guntas in Sy.No. 46lFl2 of Yetham Village, Kodair Mandal, Nagarkurnool District in the nameof the RespondentNo 5 without issuing notice to all the class- 1 legal heirsof Late PothulaVijay Sunil Reddy as illegal, arbitrary, high-handed,violative ofthe established principlesof law and further , an violative of Rights of the Petitioner underArticle 14, 2'l and 300-A of Constitution of lndia, 1950 and consequentlydirect the Respondent No.4 to cancel the succession effected in thenameof the Respondent No 5 in respect of the land admeasuring about Ac. 4-00 in Sy.No. 46lFl2of Yetham Village, Kodair Mandal, Nagarkurnool District andalso cancelthe Pattadar passbook issued to the Respondent No 5 in respect of the saidland
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition und,. llection 151 CPC praying that in the li.curlstances stated in the affidavit filec n support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respon,, :rrts to not entertain any request for lransfer of the land admeasuring Ac.4)0 Guntas in Sy. No. 46lF12 af yetram Village, Kodair Mandal, Nagarkurrr o District, by the Respondent No.5 lc an/ other person, pend ing d isposal o1' h,: present Writ Petition
Counsel for the Pet tioner: SRl. BOMMtNENI VIVEKANAND,A.
Counsel for the Res condents No.1to4: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Res londent No.5: None Appeared
The Court made the following: OROER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.37197 oF 2022
ORAL ORDER
Mr. Kuppala Ujwal Babu, leamed counsel representing Mr.
Bommineni Vivekananda, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission ol this Court to withdraw the present writ petition in view of scttlemcnt of the rnatter between the parties. He has rnoved a Courl Stip vide U.S.R. No.35716 of 2023, dated 04.04.2023 and also made
an endorsement on the case bundle to that elfect
Pcrmission is accorded.
The present Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as
withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
the writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/. G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTR
//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To, l.TwoCCstoGPFORREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana'at Hyderabad [OUTI 2. i#,;-cdto'snt. botrlvtueNlvIvEKANANDA,Advocate[oPUCl 3. Two CD coPies BM GJP
HIGH COUR"
DATED:13lAt 12023
ORDER
WP.No.37197 of 2022
i-. ir ". i I .:i -r:
,,/L,
/ -.'
/., 'l 2 tll.Y ?023 <br>1,,'i:.
DISMISSING"HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHIDRAWN WITHOUT CO JTS
tlC<br>.p-l
)_<
l.,"1
.sq)
Pothula Kamala Devi
Pothula Krishna Reddy
State of Telangana
Chief Commissioner of Land Administration
District Collector, Nagarkurnool District
Tahsildar, Kodair Mandal
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
