High Court judge dismissed a writ petition as infructuous and subsequently dismissed another presentation regarding the same matter as withdrawn without costs.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{
[3168 ]
l I I I i i I I I I I i .,
oF TELANGANA rN rHEHrGH "orIf f,Io'JtoB',#E (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, "iloTHE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL ruousANDAND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
F 20'll WRITPETITIONNO: 28791 0
Between:
KRamaDeVi,W/o'K,RamReddy,aged55years.R/o'D.No.,1-8-607, i"il#ii N;s;;NallakuntaPost Hvderabad
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArtrcle 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the frled therewith'the HighCourt may be circumstancesstated In tn" 'if'0"'t pleased toissue a Wrrtor o'0"|.ol. direction' more particularly one in the nature of Writof Mandamusoy crriig for the records pertainingto the Crl'M P' No 1834/ 2010in C C No 14 ;r"2009 filed by the 3rd respondentu/s 3 of the criminarLaw (Amendment) ordrnance,1944 rrw sectron 5(6) of the prevention of CorruptionAct'1988 on t;file of the Court of Special Judge for CBI Cases' Hyderabadanddeclare tnatthe actionof issuing ordervide C No lu3g/11/2008- ClU, dated04-06-2010o, tnt Z"O respondent and the consequential factionof the 3rdrespondent in frlrng tne saiOCri'ttitp' No' 1834of 2010 in C C No 14 of 2009for attaching tne p'ope't'esof the petrtioner as arbltrary' illegal and without iurisdictionand consequentiy ."t.r,0" tne proceedrnss of authorizationissued ,"il:"# s;; i-*"-l,,rn,irJiooa cru dated 04-06-2010 in so far asthe properties ofthe petrtroner rs concerned which are mentioned in the Schedule of Crr Mp No1834 ot 2O1Ounderthe heading Propertiestabulated 'ntn" 'liJ ,lmmovable propertres, ,,,,"1-,, *o 1(houseat Kutbiguda) and under the heading MovantePropertres'at ltems No 1(6) andNo2
t
t
PMP. NO35600 0F 201',1 r.A. NO :'loF 2011
PetitlonUndersectionl5lCPCprayingthatlnthecircumstanceSstated may bepleased to in the affidavitfiled in support of tn" p"iitlon' tn" uigt' stay theProceedings in Crrrt./l p l'lo' 1834/ 2010 in c'C -CourtNo' 14 of 2009 on the ,uJgefor cBt cases.Hyderabad to an extent of the fite ofproperties thecourt of of ,n" the "r"",ripetitionel. -*nitn are mentionedin the Scheduleof Propertiestabulatedin tne sa'J CrI M P' No' 1834 of 2010 under the heading ,lmmovableProperties.,titemr.lo.l(houseatKutblguda)andundertheheading 'tvlovable Properties' atltems No 1(6) and No 2'
counser forthe Petition"'' Ti, ililll,iTlXsis*tttNrrNG
FoR
Counselfor the Respondent No'1: "--SRI GADI PRAVE^EN. KUMAR' Di. soLlclroRGENERAL oF lNolA
Counsel forthe RespondentNo'2 & 3: - - ' -
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.28791 OF 20ll
ORDER:
Sri Ms. Aishwarya, iearned counsel, representing
Sri K.R.K.V.Prasad, leamed counsel for the petitioner, on instructions
would submit that cause in the presenr rvrit petition does not survive for
adjudication and it has become in ll'uctuous
Recording the said submission, rhis rvrit petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand
closed.
\
//TRUECOPY// ^"""?J'i^tYiE3['+'iISECTIO FFICER
To,
1 2 3ffi 333381[[,Ty-i0e:ft?s$X"-",5".!o.I,u""to..ClToRGENERAL OF INDIA IOPUC] 3.Two CD Copies
BN
BS
q
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210412023
ORDER
i 31 tii{ :rlli
WP.No.28791 ot 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
wi'd $to e
KramaDevi
Union of India
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
