In this Special Original Jurisdiction matter, the High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 36557 of 2013 as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioners fair submitted that the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ' (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETIT ION NO: 36557 O F 2013
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circunlstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
;i p i ! I
I
preased to rssue a urrt' order or directron more parti.uJzrr y .,ne n the nature of writ of mandamus r er--raring the action of the responcient a.rr)orties in trying to dispossess the [rer ti()ners from their un-surveyed rands t ] an extent of 2.oo hectares at Nucrurr rleserved Forests of Arubaka ueat, Fiirmt,chandrapuram Section charrir Rar 3€r, Khammam Distrct, without for owinE crue process of raw as i'egar' contrary to raw and vioration of Articres 14. 2r-, ilnd 300-4 of the Constitution of lnrji: ancl consequen y direct the resconderls to consider the possesion of the peti ioners over the subject premises and is;s.o p. ttas under the provisions of the For ':st Schedured rribes and other Traditior i, r F,rest Dwerers (Recognition of -For( st Rights) Act, 2006 and Rules made th -rreunCer, and pass such other order or c rders as this Hon'bre court may deem f t ;rnd proper in the facts and circumstan( es of the case.
l.A. NO: 10F2013 W )MP NO 45448 OF 20131
petition under , iection 151 CpC praying that in the cirr;,r nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl nr.:7 br: pleased To direct the respondentr rrot to dispossess the petitioners tronr rheir un-surveyed lands to an extent oi 2 0o hs6121ss at Nuguru Reserved Forestr; r f A ubaka Beat, Ramachandrapuram iection, Charla Range, Khammam t)jstri,;t, pending disposal of the Writ p€ titron and pass such other order or orde. j as this Hon,ble Court may deem fit anc proper in the facts and circumstances r)t )e case.
Counsel for the petitio rers: SRl. RAM PRASAD TEEGALA
Counsel for the Respor dents: Gp FOR FORESTS
The Court made the fol owing: ORDER
I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITIO NNo .36557 of 2013
ORDER:
When the matter is tzrken up for hearing, Sri Swaroop, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly submits that the cause in the u,rit petition does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the abovc submission, this writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any,
shall stand closed.
,"
SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSrsrANr:yyB,st //TRUE COPY// SECflO]N OFFICER
1 2. One CC to Sri. Ram prass( lssg2ls Advocate tOpUCI 3. IWS 3SttSrGP ror Forests, Hisri6u;l;inli6ir't""#r"hnsana. [oUr] TJ GJP -k
HIGH COURI
DATED:06104t2023
,$
+:
I
ORDER
WP.No.36557 of 2013
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
x{,,\b"
Lingaiah and Others
The Govt Of A.P.
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
