High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging dispossession claims due to non-prosecution after multiple notices failed to elicit representation from petitioners.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303l
! I I! I I I II I I I
{ I i i lj :
i I
I I I ; i t i 1 1 l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 29323 OF 2012
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a writ, order or direction more in nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein not to dispossess the petitioners from their lands i.e. in in Sy. No. 314 for the extent of 7 acres Situated at Thoggudem Hamlet of Samitisingaram Village, Manuguru Mandal, Khammam Dist. by duly declaring the action of the respondents trying to dispossess the petitioners from their land as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-4 of constitution of lnd ia.
t.A. NO:1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 37430 OF 20'l2l
Petition under Section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of dispossession of the petitioners from their lands in Sy. No. 314 tor the extent of 7 acres Situated at Thoggudem Hamlet of Samitisingaram Village, Manuguru Mandal, Khammam District, pending, disposal of writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M.V.L. NARSAIAH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: cP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI P. SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SINGARENI COLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLESRI JUSTICE J SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.29323of 2OL2
ORDER:
When thematter is taken up for hearing on 2l'O2'2O23' therewasnorepresentationonbehalfofthepetitionersandthe matter wasposted to o3-o4.2O23' On O3'O4'2O23 also there was no representationon behalf of the petitioners'To give one hnal opportunity thematter was posted to 06'04'2023 under the caption'for dismissal'-
are not having anyinterest to prosecute the matter'
Miscellaneousapplications,pending ifany, shall stand
closed
SO/-MOHD SANAULLAHANSARI ASSISTANT,REGISTRAR /rrRUE coPY//
secrEilorrtcen
I
BN SB
I t
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610412023
ORDER
-aF I
(-
,$J Pt
N"
ril
E
s*
$,
&o s
<br>(
+.r
6 a,
WP.No.29323 o12012
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
\
\t
Boggam Rajulu
Midiam Haribabu
Government of Andhra Pradesh
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
