Justice J. Sreenivas Rao dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the submission that the cause did not survive for adjudication; pending miscellaneous applications were closed.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous and miscellaneous applications are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.36135 of 2012
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. Sowmya, learned counsel representing Sri S. Sri Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
14th February, 2023 GV/PSW
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.36135 of 2012
14th February, 2023
GV/PSW
Sri S. Sri Ram
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
