Writ petition by Scheduled Tribes challenging the legality of JPA appointments in Khammam District without local quotas was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioners when listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
131671
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 3465 5 0F 2013
Between:
AND
petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of tndia ,r"iffil:i',"tln circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamub declaring the action of the 1st respondent issued the result of the final selection list of JPA (Junior Plant Attendant) posts by Notification No.01/GGM(HR)/2010 dated 05-01-2011 and also supplementary Notification No.01/CGM(HR)12011 dated 17-10-2011 to the extent of in allocation ot 2oo/o Posts under Non-Local (NL) quota for state wide General Scheduled rribe within the Notified Tribal Area in Vth & Vlth Stages of KTpS, and LSHES in khammam District who were appointed hs PA Posts without producing Agency Area Certificates from Local Candidates of Khammam District and also who have selected under Non Local Category as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, unfair as
t
per G.O.Ms.No.97 dated j8-10-200i issued by Social Welfare (TW.EDN) and G.O.Ms.No.3 dated'10-O i -2000 issued by the Social Wetfare (TW.EDN lt) Department of Andhra Pradesh and consequenfly direct the respondents .r to 4 to cancel aI appointments arready made of the candidates and to appoint the petitioners as Junior Plant Attendant posts as Local Scheduled rribes in Khammam District
t.A. NO:1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO:43102 OF 2013t
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased issue a direction to the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to issue appointments to the petitioners in vth & vlth stages of KTPS, and LSHES scheduled Areas power Generating Stations in Khammam District pending the above Writ petition
l.A. NO: 1OF 2014(WPMP. NO:4 1301 0F 2014):
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
petition under Articre 16-4 of Writ Rures praying that in the circumstances srated in the affidavit filed jn support of the petition, the High Court may be
I
pleased to permit the Proposed writ Petitioner's to lmplead as Writ Petitioners as Nos. 6 & 7 in the above Writ Petiotin No. 34655 of 2013 and as well as in WPMP No. 431 02 of 20'13 in the interest ofjustice
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI T. G. PRASAO REDDY (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR ENERGY
The Court made the following: OROER
fr
tl
THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICEA. ABHISHEKREDDY WRIT PETITION No.3465 of 2013
ORDER:
On 21.02.2023 and 28.02.2023,when the presentWritPetition was taken up, there wasno representationfor bothsidesHence, the present Writ Petition was directedto be posted underthe caption'For Orders' on 15.03.2023.On 15.03.2023, when the present Writ Petition was taken up, therewas no representationon behalf of the learned counsel for thepetitioners.Hence,this Court has directedthe Registry to list thepresentWritPetitionon 23.03.2023under the caption'For Dismissal'. Eventoday, there is no representationfor the petitioners'
Having regard tothe above, this Couftis of the opinion thatthe petitioners are not interestedto pursuethe presentWrit Petition'
Accordingly,this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution'
Miscellaneousapplications, if anypending, shall standclosed' There shall beno order as to costs.
sD'-MoH D'stltHf HILS+SJXH ,ITRUE coPY/t (41 SECTIONOFFICER
<sup>t'',g* qglg-sl;G Prasad ReddvAdvocatg.tf"tY:,1 of reransana. [oUT] ' ) ir),i" d6.'t"ep For Energy'Highcourttort 3. TwoCD CoPies MBC SW
i-
t i
I
HIGH COURT
I !
DATED:2310312023
,1
=$
I
I s*
I
$
ORDER
WP.No.34655of 2013*
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION,WITHOUT COSTS
€
t
Amgoth Venkateswara Rao
Banoth Lalu
AP Genco
A. ABHISHEK REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
