Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging threat to dispossess petitioners from land was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to avail other remedies and dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/
[3168 ]
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OFTELANGANA AT IryDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSIIMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 34528 OF 2022
Betrveen:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the aff,rdavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and 3 in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from 2 acre 28 gts of land in Sy.No.12311 and 5 acres of land in Sy.No.l2312 of Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurment Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, respectively as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles ofnaturaljustice and against Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 and 3 not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective lands in 2 acre 28 gts of land in Sy.No.123l1 and 5 acres of land in Sy.No.123l2 of Pedda Amberpet Village. Abdullapurment Mandal. Ranga Reddy District
IA NO: t OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 and 3 not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective 2 acre 28 gts of land in Sy.No.l23ll and 5 acres of land in Sy.No.123i2 of Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurment Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. K JAGADISHWAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.34528 of 2022
ORDER:
Sri K. Jagadishu.ar Reddy, iearned counsel appearing for the petitioners filed a letter dated O4-Ol-2023 before the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty
to avail the remedies available under law.
Permission is accorded.
Granting liberty as sought, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in the Writ Petition sha,ll stand closed.
SD/- N{OIID. SANAUI,LAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY/I
I
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRI. K JAGADISHWAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE (TG), High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT
KLJ
DATED:0610112023
ORDER
WP.No.34528 of 2022
1 lrE $ r{:
Ir 1B lntl tirtt
o()-)
WP IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Chinni Raj Kumar and another
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
