Writ petition challenging the denial of service weightage marks in government recruitment was dismissed as infructuous after the matter was stated as such by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3167 ]
I t
f I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENW FOURTHDAYOF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEA.ABHISHEK REDDY
WR]T PETITION NO: 34322OF2012
Between:
Sved Yunus, Son of SyedAbbas, aged about 30 years, Residing at F-161, B- C6lony, Paloncha, Kothagudem,Khammam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitutionof lndia piaying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order or direction,more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaringthe impugned action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not awarding service weightagemarks and further action in selecting the candidates with lesser marksthan the petitioner for Trade Test in respectof selection of post of JuniorPlant Attendant notified vide Notification No.01/CGM(HR)/2010 dated05.01.20'11and SupplementaryNotification No.O1/CGM(HR)/2011 dated17.1O.2O11 as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 1 4 and 16 of theConstitutionof lndia.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 436214 O F 20121
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleasedto direct the respondents to allow thepetitioner forTrade Test for the post of Junior Plant Attendant, notified vide Notification No.01/ CGM(HRy 2010 dated 05.01.201'land Supplementary Notification No.01/ CGM(HRy2011dated17.1O.201 1 along with all other candidates now selectedunder 1:3 ratio,pending disposalof the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIP.RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the RespondentNos.1& 2: SRI C RAGHU, SC FOR AP GENCO Counsel for the Respondent No.3: M/s.K.UOAYASRI Counsel for the Respondent No.4: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHTSHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.34322 of 2012
OR-DER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the subject
matter has become infructuous.
Recording the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
in liuctuous.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs
\
SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SEC FFICER To 1. One CC to SRI P.RAVI SHANKER, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to M/s. K.UDAYA SRl, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CCto SRI C.RAGHU, SC FORAP GENCO IOPUCI 4. Two CD Copies
PSK. GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410312023
ORDER
WP.No.34322 of 2012
1 '! rE- 6'r/1 rr:'
/. ai ^'
/t''-
/rr 2 1 APil Zll'{X
l; .:
V'
\::
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUTCOSTS.
L1)
@c.,$"s
58r
X"*,
\7<br>
Sved Yunus
Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Ltd.
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
