02.11.1992, and on the strength of the said gift settlement deeds, respondent Nos.5 and 6 have obtained rnutation proceedings and also pattadar pass books. Therefore, according to the petitioner, the al'oresaid two registered gift settlement deeds are fraudulent documents executed in their favour by their father, who do not have any right and title over the aforesaid land. With the said contentions, the petitioner herein had filed an Appeal Case No.D2l144112015 under Section - 5 (5) of the ROR Act, 1971, seeking to set aside the pattas issued in favour ofrespondent Nos.5 and 6. The said appeal was allowed by respondent No.3 vide order dated 2l .11.2015 and the pattas issued in flavour of respondent Nos.5 and 6 were set aside. Entries made in the revenue records, pattadar pass books and title deeds issued in thc name of respondent Nos.5 and 6 i.vere cancelled. 'l'l-re matter rvas remanded back to respondent No.4 with a direction to conduct de novo inquiry duly affording an opportunity of hearing to both parties and other interested persons, if any, and pass appropriate orders within a period of three (03 ) months from the date of the said order.
