THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31681
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN /
WRIT PETITI o N NO:305 0F 2023
Between:
..,PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
circumstances Petition under Articre stated in the 226 0f the constitution affida.vit nteO ttrerewitn, of the rndia praying High'Cduit that in ,"V the'OJ pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the appeat oroer in Fire No.g9-2g6iEpassed 126571t201g by the Appear 1st respond.ent, /Bth Meeting without hearing physically zozz Ipplshbzorgrssrg OV aat tie a1a_tt-i6iz-petition"i representative, the appeal notice was sent to the it,i alaresi i.e. n.p. i"l6; ;; Education B.Ed., Duddeda Viildge, siddipet rr,J"no"t "no District instead of A.P.correge of Education B Ed. H.N;.1- s-l-iefiD, rasaigutti---Roai, Narayankhed Sangareddy District, in view of notice not receiveO Oy-thi petitioner, he has not attended the appeal Oetore ine appellate authoritv for presentation of his case, the non appearance of the petitio;;ir"pl*ririirJ tii 1st respondent authorities passed appeat ordei is irregat," libiilil-;;;
7
consequently direct re 1st respondent to rehear the appeal ;arse n the presence of the petitioner,
lA NO: I OF 2023
Petition under lection i si cpc praying that in the cir< urnstances stated in the affidavit filed in ;upport of the peiition, ine uigr' court rnay oe pleasea to direct the respondenls to consider the representation of the p,:titioner dated 14_ 07-2022, pending dis1res21 of the Main Writ petition;
counsel for the Petit oners: sRr K. RAMAKRTSHNA LEARNI:D couNSEL REp SRI. S GIRIMOJI RAC
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARS
The Court made the I cllowing: ORDER
HoN'Bt-E SRI JtTSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.305 OF 2023
ORAI, ORDER:
Mr. K. Ramakrishna, learned counsel representing Mr. S. Girimoji
Rao, lcarned counsel lbr the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition rvith a liberty to file fresh writ
petition. He has also made an endorsement on the case file to that effect.
(iranting liberty, as sought, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. [{owever, there shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the
Writ Pctition shall stand closed.
//TRUE GOPY//
SD/-P,CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,VI
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COUR-I
KL, J
DATED: 1910112023
ORI]ER
WP.No.3O5 o12023
'i\E STA Ie
a
o-
o.J I i riB ?$zl a':
WP IS DISMIIJSED AS WITHDRAWN OF WITHOU.. COSTS
Raos Educational Cultural-Welfare Society
A.P. College of Elementary Education
National Council for the Teacher Education
K. LAKSHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
