Bondla Nagamani And 2 Others v. State of Telangana And 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition challenging non-payment of land acquisition compensation, the Court held that since a receipt of payment signed by petitioners was produced, the petition had no substantive issue for adjudication.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition is closed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
I I t i I I j
[32561
HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 27492 OF 2022
Between
- Bgndla.NagqpanlWg [aagulu, Occ. Housewife, Mutrajpatti Village, Gajwel Mandal, Siddipet Dishict, Telangana
- Ushakoyila. Kavitha, W{o Vijay Kumar, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Mutrajpalli Village, Gajwel Mandal, Siddipet District, Telangana
- Ushakoyila Krr.slIq,. S/o. Balaram, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Mutrajpalli Village, Gajwel Mandal, Siddipet District, Telangana
...PETITIONERS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for non-payment of land acquisition compensation requires further adjudication in light of evidence that compensation was already paid.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B. G. Naghapani
- petitioner
Ushakoyila Kavitha
- petitioner
Ushakoyila K. S. S.
- respondent
State of Telangana
- respondent
District Collector, Siddipet
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/27492/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court