Dismissed

M/s Sree Varaaha Infra Developers Private Limited v. the State of Telangana and 3 Others

Telangana HC11 Jul 2023WP/32918/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad granted leave to the petitioner in Writ Petition No.32918 of 2022 to withdraw the petition challenging a sealing letter regarding a lease agreement as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition as prayed for was accorded and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

M/s Sree Varaaha Infra Developers Private Limited Vs… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁰⁹ ]

¶2

1 i l I l

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶7

WRIT PETITIO N NO: 32918 0F 2022

¶8

Between:

¶9

M/s Sree varaaha rnfra Deveropers private Limited, Registered office at 6-1136/3, Mehar Ratna Complex, Balram Colony, padmarao Nagar, Hyderabad. Represented by its Director and Authorized Signatory V.V.V.^-Saiyana rayr;;;, S/o.. M.Mutyala Rao, Aged about 66 years, Occ. Business, Arc A_l_lrctSte, Meher Nivas, Balaram Colony, padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad_500 025. ...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

'l . The State Of Telangana,. Represented by its principal Secretary, Revenue ^^{Department (Stamps and Registration), Secretariai Buildings, fiyO.raOuJ.} 2. The Diskict Collector, Hyderabad Distiict, Telangana State, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Diskict Regiskar, Hyderabad District, Telangana State, Red Hills, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Sub-Registrar, Marredpally, Office at Maredpally, Secunderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the crrcum stances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Orders Declaring the Letter Dated O41O4t2022 bearing Lr.No. 1 8212022 issued by the Respondent No.4 as unlawful arbitrary, without any Authority and Procedure laid under the lndian Stamp Act 1899 as applicable in the State of Telangana, therefo re SET-A-SIDE the same and consequen y DIRECT the Respondent No.4 to RELEASE the Lease Agreement Dated 1 610912O21 with Pending Document No.0512022 pertaining to Subject property. lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶15

Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in !.9-{!1vit^{filed in supportof the petition, ine HignCourt may} be^pteaseJ to susPEND the lmpugned Letter Dated o4lo4t2o22, bLaring Lr.No.i 8212b22 issueo by the Respondent No.4 thereby to Direct the Respondenl No.4 to RELEASE the Lease Agreement Dated 16109t2o21 with pending bocument No.osl2o22 pending disposal of this Writ Petition.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt. R.K. PRUTHV|SH, REPRESENTTNG FOR

¶17

M/s RESU LAW OFFICE

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR STAMPS AND REGTSTRATTON (TG) The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

¶20

¶21

HOII,BLE DT. JUSTICE CIIILLAKUR^SUMALATHA

¶22

V/RI'I PETITIOI] No.32918 OF 2022

¶23

q84E8

¶24

This Wr:it Petition Ls filed seeking the^lollowing substantive rr:lief

¶25

"to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direc:tion,^more particularlr., one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Letter No.I82 of 2022, dated^O4.O4.2O22, issued by respondent No.4, as unlawful,^arbitrary, u'ithout any authoritl' ar-rd procedure laid under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 as applicable in the State of Telanganil, and thereforc, set aside the samc^and consequenlly, to direct lespondent No.4 to release the Lease Agre ement dzrtcd 16.O9.2021 with^pending Documcnt No.05 of 2022 pefiaining to subject^property."

¶26

Sri R.K.Pruthvish, learned counsel, representing M/ s. Resu Lar.l. Office, learned counsel on record for^the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. A Memo filed by the lear-ned counsel for the^petitioner before the Registry to that eflect is also on record. No drrcction preventing the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition is brought to the notice of this Court

¶27

Hence, permission, as prayed for, is accorded

¶28

¶29

!)t.( .!,^.) Ll .I''tt-l29I8 rl lli )

¶30

dismissed^{as withdrawnNo} 4. The Wnt^Petittonts

¶31

order as^{to costs.}

¶32

if 5 As a sequel,^{pending miscellaneous applications'}

¶33

any, shalt^standclosed'

¶34

SD/.^{K. AMMAJI} ASSISTANTREGISTRAR /TTRUE^COPY// sEcifrDN^oFFrcER

¶35

¶36

1.) One Two^{CC CCs toto} BBi$"S,:,hiIR[f^{R"$:H'?'31"13"H?""rortheStateor} lourl

¶37

Telangana.

¶38

3 Two^{CD Co} pies

TJ GJ

l I I ! I

/ I

HIGH COURT

DATED:11t0il2023

ORDER

WP.No.32918 of 2022

IArE g)
t1
t
i
rsi<br>\\t
\

¶47

DISI4ISSING THE wtrHotrrcosrs.^{Rlr PETlrloN As} WTHDRAWN

¶48

g,
L
L'\ o

M/s Sree Varaaha Infra Developers Private Limited v. the State of Telangana and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Sree Varaaha Infra Developers Private Limited v. the State of Telangana and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhukya Lakpathi Vs State of Telangana and 4 others

Palla Bharat Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Chilkuri Madhavi Vs State of Telangana

Vankudoth Krishna, Vs Prl.Secy., Forest dept., State of T.S.

Syed Shah Hadi Hussaini Vs the Govt Ofa.P., Rep by Its Prl Secy.,Rev Dept., and 5 Others

Vankudoth Krishna , Vs The State of Telangana