Writ petition concerning excess lands and ceiling area determination by respondents was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file miscellaneous petitions.
Permission granted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to institute miscellaneous petitions; no specific substantive relief granted in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[318s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 32896 OF 2023
Between:
Mahesh Bodusu, S/o Ailaiah, Aged about 27 yearc, Occ. Social Worker, No 2-5311, Gollagudem Village, Thurkapally lvlandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Direction or an Order more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAIVIUS declaring the action of the respondent No. 1 to 8 in not acting upon the representations of the petitioner dated 02/1 112023 to conduct enquiry and identify the excess lands held by the Respondent No. I to 11 and determine the ceiling area as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to conduct enquiry and identify the excess lands held by the Respondent No. 9 to'1 '1 and determine the ceiling area and take over the excess land by considering the above representation.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 to 8 to act upon the representation of the petitioner dated O211112023 and take further course of action in accordance with law-
Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s. B. SHARADA
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 9 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 0 to 12 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE IiON'BLE SRI ]USTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT P TITION No.32 896 of 2O23
ORDER:
Learned counscl for ti-rt- 1-rq, 1i l6ner seeks permiSSion Of this Court to withdra,',/ ltre writ ljCIttio.r with llberty to institute a pIL.
The rvrit petitiL)n is dis.rrisscd as withdrawn granting the liberty sougltt for. i-i1e misccllan.rous petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed. I ircre shali i'r.r no crder as to costs.
SD/- N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO //rRUE coPY/t ASSISTANT REGISTRAR v
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BS Ksi
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611212023
ORDER
WP.No.32896 of 2023
t\E sTAre
q v
\c)
r) [ 3 JAN 702[
4-
,t
t o t' it a
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
V l,/
Mahesh Bodusu
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Telangana State
The District Collector, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District
The District Collector, Nalgonda District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhuvanagiri, Yadadri Bhongir District
Justice B.Vijayensen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
