Dismissed

G.Manohar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Jan 2023WP/32869/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus against respondents for non-conduct of land enquiry, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedies.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to avail alternative remedies granted; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.

G.Manohar Reddy Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OFTELANGANA '-AT HYDERABAD

¶2

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[316{r I

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY " TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE /.

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN /. WRIT PETI'I'ION NO: 32869 OF 2022

¶8

Between:

¶9

G.Manohar Reddy, S/o.Late G.Ganga Reddy, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.H.No. I I -l -27611, Beside Arvind Home, Armoor Road, Nizamabad-503003

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State ofTelangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶13

2 The District Collector, Nizamabad District at Nizamabad

¶14

3 The Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District

¶15

4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District

¶16

5 The Tahsildar, Nizamabad (North), Nizamabad District

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the the action of the respondents in not conducting the enquiry in respect of enquiry and submit a report in respect ofland in Sy.No.251lEEl and 251lEE2 is an extent of Ac.l-00 gts situated at Kanteshwar, Nizamabad North, Nizamabad District in pursuance of proceedings No.D1l775l20l9 dated 20-05-2019 and reminders dated 23-03-2022, 28-05-2022 of the 2nd respondent is wholly illegal, arbitrary

¶19

IA NO: I OF 2022

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 5 to submit report by conducting the enquiry forthwith in^pursuance of proceedings No.Dll775/2019 dated 20-05-2019 and rerninders dated 23-03-2022, 28-05-2022 of the 2nd respondent

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. I V RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY Counscl for the Respondents : GP FORREVENUE (TG) The Court made the following

¶22

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.32869 of 2o22

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission ol this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to avail alternative remedies.

¶26

Permission is accorded.

¶27

1S Granting liberty AS sought, this writ petition

¶28

dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs

¶29

As a seque 1, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,

¶30

pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶31

SD/- II,IOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

w-_-SECTIONOTFICER

To,

One CC to SRI. I V RADHAKRI SHNA MURTHy Advocate [OPUC]

¶36

TwoCCsto Gp FORREVENUE (TG), High Court for the Staie of Teiangara,

¶37

Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶38

Two CD Copies

IIIGH COT]I{T

I<LJ

DATED: I l/01/2023

1 9 STATQ
t
cf,i)* [1ttB M2
^ -.,, .

¶43

OITDER

¶44

WP.No.32tl69 of 2022

¶45

WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

G.Manohar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Manohar Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M Narsimharamaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

R.J.R.M.Educational Society Vs The State of Telangana

Gandikoti Venu Vs The State of Telangana and 3others

Bgs Members Association Muthangi Vs The State of Telangana

Tadaboina Narasimha Vs The State of Telangana and 4 Others

M/s. Panchajanya Enterprises Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Bsnl)