The Telangana High Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw Writ Petition No. 38529 of 2022, which challenged the inaction of revenue authorities in mutating agricultural land records, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition and liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 38529 OF 2022
Between:
Gandikoti Venu, S/o Yallaiah, aged about 39 years, Occ farmer, R/o. H.No. 8- \19!?q,Kranthi NagarColony, PochammaTemple, Karmanghat, Hyderabad- 500079
...PETITIONER
AND
..,RESPONDENTS
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus, by declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.4 in not mutating the name of the petitioner pertaining to the agriculture land tn Sy.No. 201 to an extent of Ac. 15-00 guntas situated in the Limits of Saheb Nagar Kalan Village of Hayatnagar Mandal, Rangareddy District, even after presence of the ROR proceedings vide lilRO No. B/3218/94 dated 26,06.1998 is ittegal, arbitrary, and against the Telangana Rights in Lands and Pattadar Passbook Ac|,2020.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. the High Court may be pleased the actions of the Respondent-Authorities in not mutating my name wtth respect to the
Iand as stated sup-a rs directly effecting my constitutional an( f rndamental rights more particularly, lre entire actions of the RespondenlAuthoritir:s are in violation of Articles 14. 21 ;nd 300-A of the Constitution of lndia, penjing oisposal of the above wntpetitron.
Counsel for the P€ titioner: SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the R( spondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made th e following: ORDER
I
I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
IVRIT PETITION No.38 529 of 2o22
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/-MOHD SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANLREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Go SECTTON OFFICER
To
1 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 2 One CC to SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies
PSK. BS
Bs(
HIGH COUIIT
DATED:1 0111112023
ORDER
i:l
i-) 1[ tlq ?'ifl
WP.No.385i'|.9 of 2022
DISMISSIN(i THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDFAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
C
--,,,
g,s(
Gandikoti Venu
The State of Telangana
The District Collector, Rangareddy District
The Revenue Division Officer, Rangareddy East
The Tahsildar, Hayatnagar Mandal
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
