The writ petition filed by M/s. Colors Out door advertising challenging non-refund of service tax was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to avail other legal remedies.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[337e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originil Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION NO:41964 OF 2022
Between:
M/s. Colors Out door advertising, Rep by its Partner S/O P. Sambasiva Rao aqed about 5BYrs R/o. H.No 1-g-485t1, LatithadgarAdikmet Hyderabad 500044
...PETITIONER
AND
The Assistant commissioner of Central Tax, Tarnaka GST division,2nd Floor Elegant Edifice 3-4-'l 18/2 NR,Ramanthapur, HYDERABAD -500013
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue the Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction by set asiding the orders passed by THE COMISSIONER OF G.S.T and CENTRAL TAX HYDERABAD APPEAL.II COMMISSIONERATE, IN APPEAL NO. 2812021(SC) ST 464 vide ORDER -lN-APPEAL NO. HYD - SVTAX-SC-AP2-02022-23-ST dated'1410712022 and declare the Non refund of Tax by Paid under mistake of fact for the Financial Year 2017 -20 18 through Challan No 36308 on dated 0610712017 as illegal and violation of Article 265 of the Constitution of lndia and call all records.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the crrcumstarrces statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, theHigh Court may be pleasedto direct the Respondent to refund the service Taxpaid bythe Petilioner for the financial Year 2017 - 2018 under mistake of fact on dated 06-07-201,'
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SRIHARI CHUNDURU
Counsel for the Respondent : SWAROOP OORILLA
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
THD HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION No.41964 of 2022
ORDER: (per Hon'ble Si Justice P.SAM KOSHY)
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time, prays lor withdrarval of the w,rit petition with a liberty to avail other legal remedies available under the law
In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as u,ithdrawn. No order as to costs
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed
SD/- V. KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
--/-lrt,' SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRI SRIHARI CHUNDURU, Advocate. TOPUCI 2. One CC to SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, Advocate. [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies. BSK LS -k-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411212023
ORDER
a e sTATe o A
a
v
a
11 0L[ 2t2i
co
Dggt'r
WP.No.41964 ot 2022
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
@;"P(*-/ .,,/ \ , \
M/s. Colors Out door advertising Rep by its Partner S/O P. Sambasiva Rao
The Assistant commissioner of Central Tax, Tarnaka GST division
P. Sam Koshy
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
