Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, moreparticularly onein the natureof writ of mandamus declaring the action ofthe 2nd respondentin non-regularizingthe services of thepetitioner as MathematicsLecturerin pursuanceof the proceedings sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2ndrespondent videproceedings File No'CTE- EST2/ SMSL/ 2Ot 2O22-ESTABLISHMENI-2CrEPart(1), datedO1t08l2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No, 16, FINANCE(HRM.l) DEPARTMENT,dated 26t02t2016 and issuedguide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRt\r- It2O14, dated 26t02t2o16 onpar at par similar situated persons regularizedthe services vide G.o.Ms No.31, HigherEducation (TE) Departmentdated 0110512023 as an illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory,unjust, unfair,unreasonable,whimsical, non-application of mind, unlawful,unconstitutionaland in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violationof Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and also against the catena ofjudgments of this Honouarablecourt and an Apex Court and set-aside the sameand consequently,direct the respondents to regularize the services of thepetitioneras MathematicsLecturer in pursuance of the 3rd respondent sentproposal to the 2nd respondent, videproceedings File No CTE-EST2/ SMSLZ:Ol2O22-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part( 1 ) dated 01 l0Bl2O23 pursuance of the G,O.MS. No.'16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT,dated 26t0212016 and issuedguide lines videbircular MemoNo. 308-fu51/A3/HRM-|/ 2014, dated 26t02t2016 onpar at par similar situated persons regularizedthe services vide G.O.Ms No 31,Higher Education (TE) Departmentdated 0110512023 with consequential benefits