The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the allotment of spouse category to a district contrary to the petitioner's option, granting liberty to challenge the subsequent proceedings.
Liberty to challenge proceedings in Memo No. Spl/Secretary Peshi/2021-SP476 dated 07.11.2022 if advised; other pending petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 6871 OF 2022
Between:
G.Krishna, S/o Kurmaiah, aged about 44years, SchoolAsst.(Maths) Z.P.H.School (Boys), Marikal, Narayanapet Dist.(lD.No.17OOOrrl..r.r,r,on=*
AND
...REspoNDENrs
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to issue a Writ order or order more particularly in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus declare the impugned Proc.ES/ SC/ MA/NARA/SACS/0756 dt.21 .12.2021 issued by the 1st respondent allottingto Narayanapet Distcontrary to petitioners option exercised to Mahabubnagardistrict under spousecategory as per Guideline 23 proviso of G.O.Ms.No.317 d1.06.12.2021 andnot implementing Govt.Memo.No.1655/SPD-l/2021- Bd1.24-12-2O21wilh regard to allotment of spouse category candidates despite availabilityof vacancies in Mahabubnagardist on the pretext that there is ban to certain districtswithout any written instructions or G.O., while implementing and allotting spouse categorycandidates in other districts as per the above memo above is clearlyillegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and unjust and set aside the same and consequentlydeclare that the petitioneris entitled to be posted as School Asst.(Maths)in Mahabubnagardistrictunder spouse category asper option with all consequentialbenefits.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for reallotment to Mahabubnagar district by disposing of appeal d1.24-12-202'l pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. RAMGOPAL RAO
Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No. 6a7l of 2022
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Services-l has placed ctn ieaord a copy of the proceedings in Memo No.Spl/Secretary Peshr/2O21-5P476, dated NII.O7.2022, and submitted that in compliance of the interim order passed by this Court, the respondents havc disposed of the appeal hled by the petitioner duly rejecting his case.
Miscellaneous pe[itions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No
costs
SD/. P.PADMANABHAR EDDY ASSISTANTREGIS R //TRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 One CC toSri M RamgopalRao Advocate-[O.?Uql. 2 Two ccs toGp For S"*i..s,j-t"igricorrii jit.siate of Telangana.[ouT] 3. Two CDCoPies
MBC GJ
s
HIGH COURT
i i i
' I I l I i I
DATED: 2011212023
1t{E ST4 14:
c
P
o 2 7 J A N 202f L)
sspATCH
ORDER
WP.No.6871 of 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
<br>
G.Krishna
The District Educational Officer, Mahabubnagar District
The District Educational Officer, Narayanapeta District
The District Collector-cum-Chairman, Allocation Committee
The Director of School Education, Govt. of T.S.
The State of Telangana
Pulla KartHIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
