Single judge order holding contempmt case closed after respondents submitted implementation of APAT order. No costs awarded. Pending miscellaneous applications stand closed.
Case closed without costs; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I ! II I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED NO: 542 OF 2017
Between:
...PETTTtONER(S)
ANO
...RESPONDENTS
I i
contempt case under sections 10 t<t 12 0f contempt of court Act 1g71 to punish the respondents No. r to 3 fof not irnprementing the orders of this Honbre Tribunar in o'A No 1016 0f 2016, dt.'r4-03-2016, in accordance with raw and pass such order or orders
Counsel for the petitione(s): SRI CH GANESH
Counset for the Respondents: Gp FOR SEFIVICES V
The Court made the foflowing: OROER
:1
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO 9NTEMPT cAsE(TRl No.542 OF 2OL7
ORDER:
The petitioner frled C.A.No.587 of 2016 before Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (APAT' for brevity) to punish the respondents for non-implementation of the orders passed by APAT in O.A.No. 1016 of 2016 dated 14.03.2016. By virtue of abolition of APAT, the matter was transferred to this Court and renumbered as CC (TR) No.542 of 2017.
' !,:. j.-l
To,
.,1..]' .:i
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending, shall stand closed. rfT - SD/.B.SATY
SD/.B.SATY ,!i. DEPUTY REGI 'i..r //TRUE COPY// a-; i Eta i,: SECTION FFICER .1..
f . iwo CCs toGP for ServicesV, HighCourt for the State of Telangana' IOUTI 2. OneCC to Sri CH Ganesh, Advocate [OPUC]
.>.
j). .-
t
i' .i
1
tt
illii
l
i
!: i
d t
-:
t
HIGH COURT ,ri &#i +r -': , iDATED:-0810912023 " S- . t i: ffi&t : .- i. H.gl ii :ir frl#l', 1 il.#SI I :' : ilir? ;.ilii!i.i i rt:i!.:.
oR D ER
x {I
ft
-:i 1 IC;-, 2. l- GB) N 6.s+z of 2o1t
#'l,$
i.
!. .-1: ':
,{
fiB
c os ng lie Contempt Gase (TR)
.r:
iF
+_
'4', .q{
.ii
-].:
v :i:
ri 'iX^ ,. i','j!-
1 'i!1, i. .4
.,t ;'i i
tii{".
Fr
+;i i?!
i
!. i, : .:i
i':
| .-:
\q t$ $1)
i' .'
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R Ramchandraiah
V Yellamma
Mahesh Dattu Akka
B Ramakrishna Rao
M V Reddy
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
