Dismissed

M/s. Muslim Educational Social and Cultural Organization (Mesco v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Nov 2023WP/32009/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana granted permission to withdraw a writ petition filed under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC. The petition sought a writ of Mandamus directing police officers to register an FIR for various IPC offences. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition accorded; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

M/s. Muslim Educational Social and Cultural… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32e6 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH^{DAYOF NOVEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY THREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SR! JUSTICEC.V.BHASKARREDDY}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:^{32009 oF 2023}

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s. Muslim Educational^{socialand cultural organization (MESCO,Rep.by its Hon.} 3L'jr.iJr'iir. rarlli Sr,a6e."^{Wio. or. M.A. Nlveem Khah Aged 37 vears,olo' 22-} 1-107311'. Darulshifa,^{Hyderabad - 500024}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of^{Telangana, Rep. by its PrincipalScretary,Home Department'} Telangana Secretariat,^Hyderabad.

¶12

The Commissioner^{of Police' Eaniara Hills, Hyderabad'}

¶13

The Assistant^{commissioner of Police, Mir chowk,Purani Haveli Hyderabad.}

¶14

4.ThelnspectorofPolice,MirChowkPolicestationMirChowk,Hlderabad'

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article^{226 oI lhe constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filed therewith,the High court may be} pleased to issue a writ, order^{or Direction more particularlyone in the nature of} wRlT oF MANDAMUS^{declaring that the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 in} not registering an^{FIR pursuant to the police complaint of the Petitionerdated} 08.11 .2023 for the^{offences under Sec. 419, 42O, 403,405,406, 447} '^{464' 468'} 471 and 5o6 of IPC^{R/w Sec. 34 IPC as illegal,arbitrary, void and against the} principles of natural^justice and^{consequentlydirect the RespondentsNo.4 to} register an FIR forthwith^{pursuant to the police complaintof the Petitionerdated} 08.11.2023 for^{the offences under Sec. 419, 42O' 4O3,405,406, 447' 464' 468'} 471 and 506 of IPC^{R"/w Sec. 34 lPC.}

¶17

¶18

!A NO: 1 OF 2023

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the Respondents No.4 to register an FIR forthwith^pursuant to the^police complaint of the Petitioner dated 08.11.2023 for the offences under Sec. 419, 420, 403,405, 406, 447, 464, 468, 471 and 506 of IPC R/w Sec. 34 lPC.

¶20

Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.A.BASITH

¶21

Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. GP FOR HOME

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

i/ ./i'

¶24

¶25

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

¶26

WRIT PETITION No. 32OO9 of2o23

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner requests ttre Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedies as available in law.

¶29

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶30

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

¶31

withdrawn by gralting liberty as prayed for. No costs.

¶32

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if

¶33

any, shall stand closed.

¶34

To,

¶35

SD/- N.SRIHARI ASSTSTANT RE9IST9R r,7.'' SECTION OFFICER

¶36

//TRUE COPY//

¶37

One CC to SRI M.A.BASITH,^Advocate. [OPUC] i: iil aas'to A-SSI.^{GC rOn nOuE,Higih Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶38

Two CD Copies.

BSK GJ

HIGH COURT

DATED:2011112023

ORDER

1 e STATc
() 13 [Et 2[23 ^bo
a-f<br>*
n D:.SF,A1 CY<br>

¶46

WP.No.32009 of 2A23

¶47

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WTHOUT COSTS

¶48

@oPi0

¶49

¶50

M/s. Muslim Educational Social and Cultural Organization (Mesco v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Muslim Educational Social and Cultural Organization (Mesco v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karne Ravi Vs The State of Telangana

Akkem Mallesh Yadav Vs The State of Telangana

Vaddevalli Lalitha Saran Kumar Vs Union of India

Nandigama Prabhu Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Komirelli Lalitha Vs The State of Telangana

Lalas Cafe and Bistro Vs The State of Telangana