Lawyer Suhaas sought permission to withdraw Writ Petition No.30996 of 2023. The Court granted permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek other remedies under law. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to avail remedies under law was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 30996 OF 2023
Between:
Dasarla Bharathamma, Wo: Mallesh, aged about 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o H.No.1-8, Lingojigudem Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadadri-Bhongiri District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction more partrcularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.4 to 8 in non-considering the representation of the petitioner and non-initiating to take necessary action against the illegal construction of the respondent Nos.9 to 12 in the loint family prope(y of the petitioners to an extent of Ac.5.05 gts in Sy.llo.12lfu1 which is situated at Thupranpet Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadad ri-Bhongiri District, who are constructed the buildings in the land of the petitioner, without converting the agriculture lands into non-agriculture and without taking any permissions and constructed the heavy college buildings and without consent an(, knowledge to the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct respondent Nos.4 to 8 to consider the representation of the petitioner and to take necessary action against the illegal construction of the respondent Nos.g to 12 in thejoint family property of the petitioners to an extent of Ac.5.05 gts in Sy.No.1 2lN1 which is situated at Thupranpet Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadad ri-Bhongiri I)istrict, who are constructed the buildings in the land of the petitioner, without converting the agriculture lands into non-agriculture and without taking any permissions and constructed the heavy college buildings and without consent and knowledge to the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent Nos.4 to 8 to consider the representation of the petitioner and to take necessary action against the illegal construction of the respondent Nos.9 to 12 in the .ioint family property of the petitioners to an extent of Ac.5.05 gts in Sy.No.12lA/1 which is situated at Thupranpet Village, Choutuppal Mandal,
Yadadri-Bhongiri District, who are constructed the buildings in the landof the petitioner, without converting the agriculture lands into non-agriculture and without taking any permissions and constructed the heavy college buildings andwithout consent and knowledge to thepetitioner pending disposal of the above Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1,2,4 and 7: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.3,5 and 6: GPFOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.8: SRI P. KISHORE RAO, SC
Counsel for the Respondent No.:9 lo 12:----
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.3O996 of 2023
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Suhaas, learned counsel representing, Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learned colrnsel for the petitioner, after the arguing the matter at length seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedies as available under law.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
-a.
SECT|bN.''''---OFFICER
To,
TJ BS
HIGH COURT
DATED:0811112023
ORDER
WP.No.30996 of 2023
E STATE o
(
f,o [,,\ \j['[ 2t8 za
!)
t D:_ c !,1 1. f c*(
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
Iv<br>v)
')/^
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant permission to withdraw the writ petition filed against illegal construction.
Whether to dispose of miscellaneous applications pending in the matter.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
None cited in the orderReferred
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dasarla Bharathamma
State of Telangana
Commissioner, Panchayat Raj Department
District Collector
District Panchayat Officer
Revenue Divisional Officer
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
