Dismissed

S.K. Khasim v. The Tahsildar, Kodada Mandal

Telangana HC7 Nov 2023WP/27412/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this order, the High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 27412 of 2011 as infructuous after the Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the cause no longer survived for adjudication. The petitioner sought restoration of a kerosene quota withdrawn by the respondent, but the petition was disposed of without hearing no representation.

What the court decided

AI extract

S.K. Khasim Vs The Tahsildar, Kodada Mandal — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 2741 2 0F 2011

¶7

Between:

¶8

9'[.x!g:i.'^{S/o. Moulana,.aged51 years. occ} : Kerosene Hawker shop Kaouoafiul, n/o H.No.4 71-13t3t2. VinJyak Nisar. rown ;il"t,i;ft;:"k.0:ri:i'iiSisr#lL

¶9

.....PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

'1. The Tahsildar, Kodada Mandat, Natgonda District.

¶12

B. Satish, S/o. not known Dealer Shop Kapughullu-2 and 3, Kodada Mandal, Nalgonda District

¶13

.....RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition Under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavrt fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction decrarrng the action of the 1'r respondent herein in withdrawing the kerosene quota of 286 Nos. of Ration cards from the shop Kapugallu_1 in Kodada Mandar, District Nargonda without issuing notice as bad in law, iflegar, arbitrary and vioration of naturar .iustice and suspend the order No. Bt2g7r2o11 dated 09-09-2011 and aflotment of Kerosene Quota to Kapugaflu-3 in Kodada Mandal, District Nargonda to the 2"d respondent and consequenfly direct the .1sr respondent to restore the Kerosene euota of Shop Kapugallu-1 in Kodada Mandal, District to the petitioner herein.

¶15

!.A.NO:1 OF 20111WPMP. NO:33 825 0F 2011)

¶16

Petition Under Section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High cou,t may be preased to

¶17

stay the allotment of Kerosene Quota to the 2nd respondent,s shop Kapugallu-3, relating to the Kerosene Quota of petitioner's Shop Kapugallu-1 in Kodada Mandal, District Nalgonda subject to pending final result of the \ryrit petition.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.PARTHA SARATHY

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

¶20

The Court made the following ORDER

¶21

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO

¶22

WRIT PEIITION No.27412 of 20tL

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶25

lrarned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents basing on the instructions

¶26

submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive [or adjudication.

¶27

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition

¶28

is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

¶29

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶30

closed.

¶31

SD/-C. PRAVEEN^KUMAR ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //rRUE coPY/t C:U

¶32

SECTICiN OFFICER

¶33

To' " 1 . T*o CCs to^{GP For CivilSupplies, High Court for the State of Telanganaat} Hvderabad [OUT]

¶34

z oi,""cCi.^{dri trrt.partraSarathy, Advocate[OPUC]}

3 Two CD Copies

SA BS R

HIGH COURT

DATED:0711112023

ORDER

WP.No.27412 of 2011

$E STAf6.
o
(.) 23 ti0\l 2!ll rt
d+
t
t .)EsPAIc

¶42

DISMISSING TIIE W.P

¶43

AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COS'I S.

¶44

6tr['"dd

S.K. Khasim v. The Tahsildar, Kodada Mandal

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

S.K. Khasim v. The Tahsildar, Kodada Mandal

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sai Reddy, Nizamabad Dist Vs Prl Secy, Iandc Dept, Hyd and 3 Others

The Wholesale Fruit Commission Agents Association and 61 others Vs The State of Telangana and 2 other

Ayyadapu Andalu Vs the State of Telangana

Ashoka Industries, Rice Mill Vs The State of Telangana

Kassey Samuel Ratnam Vs The State of Telangana

Uday Kumar Jain, Vs The State of Telangana