Dismissed

R. Vamshavardhan Rao v. The Chief Executive Officer

Telangana HC15 Nov 2023WP/29307/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana closed Writ Petition No. 29307 of 2010 and Miscellaneous Petition No. 1 of 2010 recording the petitioner's submission that the cause does not survive the afflux of time. The petition sought to set aside an entrustment agreement for construction work.

What did the court decide?

None. The writ petition and miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs due to afflux of time.

R. Vamshavardhan Rao Vs The Chief… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO 29307 0F 2010

¶7

Between:

¶8

R. Vamshavardhan Rao, S/o. Lakshman Rao, aged about 37 years, R:/o. T Gowaram^(V), Gundlapalli^(Dindi) Mandal, Nalgonda District, A.P.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Chief Executive Officer, ZPP Nalgonda District, at Nalgonda

¶12

2 The Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Miryalguda, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh

¶13

3 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Gundlapalli (Dindi) Mandal, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh

¶14

4 The Dy. Executive Engineer, PRI Sub Division, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh

¶15

5 P. Chandrakala, R/o. T. Gowraram Village, Gundlapalli (Dindi Mandal), Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh

¶16

(Since the order dt. 271912013 has not been complied with WP stands dismissed as against R5 as per the said order.)

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Atticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of lhe respondents herein in entrusting the work, Construction of compound wall to ZPHS building, at T. Gowraram village of Gundlapalli (Dindr) t,landal, Nalgonda District, A.P. to the 5rn respondenl herein^is bad, arbitrary, illegal, unjust unreasonable and violation of^principles ot^natural justice by settrng aside the entrustrnenUagreement, dt.6.9.2010 between the respondent No. 2 and 5 herein for the said work and consequently direct the

¶19

respondents to allow the petitioner for execution of the above said work to enable to complete the same, by paying the time to time bilts to him.

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WP MP NO: 37314 OF 20101

¶21

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that rn the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased direct the respondents lo allow the petitioner for execution of the wo'k, construction of compound wall to ZPHS building, at T. Gowraram village of Gundtapalli (Dindi) Irilandal, Nalgonda District, A.P. , by suspending the entrustnrent / agreement, dt.6.9.2010 between the respondent No.2 and 5 herein for the said work, by paying part payment to the petitioner.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. VENKATESWAR RAO

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: KTSHORE RAO PUSKURU (SC FOR TS ztLLA PARTSHADS)

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENryAS RAO

¶26

WRIT PETITION No. 293O7 of2O1O

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

When the matter is taken up lor consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that by virtue of afflux of time, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.

¶29

Recording the above submission, the Writ Pcririon is

¶30

closed. No costs

¶31

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand

¶32

closed.

¶33

SD/-K.SREERAMA^MURTHY ASSISTANT^REGI9TRAR rt^"/ //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶34

To, 1 One CC to Sri^{P Venkateswar Rao'Advocate [-OPU^CI} i 6liE EE i. sli'iiiriore^{niti;iri.i,,r'tscfor rs Zilla Pa'rishads) [oPUC]} 3, Two^{CD CoPies}

T J BS

?rte\

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 511112023

ORDER

WP.No.29307 of 2010

.1
1' IE STArq
'(,
o tt :i 0E[ 2023 ol
*
:; r,./,.1C$ iO

¶42

CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶43

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶44

@q"q zs\rr\zr'

R. Vamshavardhan Rao v. The Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Vamshavardhan Rao v. The Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Cis-Trans Gene, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Shankar Lala Jaiswal Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Pannala Kannamma Vs The Gram Panchayat, Pasara

P.Raju Vs The District Collector

Rapolu Datta Ganesh, Nalgonda Dist. Vs Commr. and Director of Handlooms A.P. Hyd and 2 Others

Syed Abdul Majeed, Warangal Dist. Vs Commr. Nagar Panchayat, Warangal Dist. and Another