The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous at the hearing, where the petitioner fairly submitted that the cause did not survive for adjudication, with no costs awarded.
No costs awarded; pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVETMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:22451 OF 2013
Between:
ItI/s CIS-TRANS GENE, Rep. by S.lndrasena Reddy,S/o Late S.Narayanareddy, Hindu,aged about 46 yrs, Rl/o.Plot No.106, Sy.No.167, Dhoolapally Road, Jeedimetla, Ranga Reddy Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the second respondent daled O4.O7.2013 vide proceedings No.PP-ll(1)134212012 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust without proper application of mind and against to the rightsguaranteed under the Constitution of lndia,particularly, Articles 14 and 19(g) of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently, direct the second respondent forthwithto send the seized sample to the Central lnsecticides Laboratory for re-analysisby setting aside the impugned proceedings.
t.A. NO:1OF 2013(WPMP.NO:27540oF 2013)
Pelition underSection151 cPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiledin supportof the petition, the High Court maybe pleased to directthesecondrespondenthereinforthwithtosendtheseizedSampletothe Central lnsecticidesLaboratoryfor re-analysis by setting asidethe impugned proceedings.
Counsel for thePetitioner: SRI RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Counsel forthe Respondents:GP FOR AGRICULTURE
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEJ. SREENIVAS RAO
Writ Petit ion No. 22451 of2Ol3
ORDER:
When the matter is taken upfor hearing,learned
counsel for the petitionerfairlysubmits that the causein
the Writ Petitiondoes not survive for adjudication.
2 Accordingly, the Writ Petitionis dismissedas
infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneouspetitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/- G. SIRE HA ASSISTANT REGIS
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION FICER
To, 1. One CC to SRI RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, Advocate. IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
GJP
"}
HIGH COURT
DATED:1411112023
C$ 1 $e SrAr €
o 0 2 DEC 2[?3 a
*
{t
DFlt oat.
ORDER
WP.No.22451 of 2013
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
'.\D1
><br>93
ITI/s CIS-TRANS GENE
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner & Director of Agriculture
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
