Dismissed

M/s. Balaji Nutrients (P) Ltd. v. The Agricultural Market Committee, Gaddiannaram

Telangana HC10 Nov 2023WP/29186/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the requirement to obtain a license under the A.P. (Agricultural Market Produce and Livestock) Markets Act 1966, concluding that the cause failed as the petitioner already held a valid license.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, to stand closed.

M/s. Balaji Nutrients (P) Ltd. Vs The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^3s03 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 29186 OF 2008

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s. Balaji Nutrients (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Devatha Ashok, S/o. Devatha Sankaraiah, Aged about 48 years, Survey No.419 Turkayamjal (V), Hyathnagar (M), Ranga Reddy District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Agricultural Market Committee, Gaddiannaram, Rep. by its Spl. Grade Secretary at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

2 The Commissioner & Director of [/arket, Near Osman Gunj, Mansur Bagh, Hyderabad.

¶13

3 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Secretary, Agriculture and lvlarket Dept., Telangana State Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

(R3 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 1914116 in WPMP. 54454115.)

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in insisting that the petitioner shall obtain a license under the provisions of A.P. (Agricultural lVlarket Produce and Livestock) Markets Act 1966 as illegal irregular arbitrary unjustified and unsustainable and setaside the show cause notice No.GiSOLBNiRice Mill/78l2008-Ogl41 dated 1-12-2008 of the^'1'r respondent.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP- NO; 38126 OF 2008)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of show cause notice No.G/SOLBN/Rice lt/ill/7812008-09/41 dated 1-12-2008 including the^prosecution of the petitioner.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KARRI MURALI KRISHNA

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: SRI C. HARI PREETH, S.C. FOR AGRICULTURE MARKET COMMITTEE

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR AGRICULTURE

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENI/AS RAO

¶24

WRTT PETITIoN No.2918 6 of 2OO8

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel basing on the instructions furnished by the respondents produced a copy of the Form of Licence Renewa-l granted in favour of the petitioner frorn 20.O8.2O16 and ending on 31.03.2021. In view of the same, cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

¶27

Accordingly, the writ petition is disrnissed as infrr.rctuous.

¶28

As a seqr.rel, miscellaneor-rs petitions, pending if any,

¶29

sha,ll stand closed.

¶30

¶31

Sd/- K. VENKAIAH //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT &REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

¶32

To,

¶33

One CC to Sri Karri ltlurali Krishna, Advocate [OPUC]

¶34

One CC to Sri C. Hari Preeth, S.C. for Agriculture^{Market Committee} [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Agriculture, High Court^{for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies TJ MP \ k

HIGH COURT

DATED:1011112023

ORDER

WP.No.29186 of 2008

1 t{e st^re o
(
ri
i-
f
2 E N'tii Lii) J o
L)
t
t
OL S pqTC,

¶40

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶41

AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶42

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶43

2\ \

M/s. Balaji Nutrients (P) Ltd. v. The Agricultural Market Committee, Gaddiannaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Balaji Nutrients (P) Ltd. v. The Agricultural Market Committee, Gaddiannaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms. K. Tirumlaleswari Vs Sri.I. Samuel Anand Kumar, IAS

P. Gunaseelan Vs The Dist. Panchayat Officer

M.M.Luther, Vs Chandra Mohan Reddy

Kola Srinivas Vs Allneni Ram Mohan Rao

M/s. Vasavi Parboiled Industries, Vs Secy., Civil dept., State of T.S.

K. Veeresha Lingam Vs Mr. J. Pandu Naik