K. Veeresha Lingam v. Mr. J. Pandu Naik
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt proceedings were closed as the respondent had provided sufficient compliance with the Court's earlier order in W.P. No. 45790 of 2022. The petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the specific proceedings if advised.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; no punishment awarded; liberty granted to petitioner to question compliance proceedings in higher Court if so advised.
What the court decided
I33oq I
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
co NTEMPT CASE NO: 2373 O 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 High court may be pleased to punish the Respondent for willfulry disobedience in compliance of the Order daled 2311212O22 in W.p. No. 45790 ot 2O22.
Between
K.. Veeresha Lingam, S/o Prabhu Lingam, age 40 years, Occ : Contractor, PJo. Bomraspet Village & Mandal, Vikara-bad Dis'[rict.
...PETITIONER
AND
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt case requires adjudication after the respondent acted in compliance with the earlier order.
Whether the petitioner can question the respondent's subsequent proceedings following the immunity granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Veeresha Lingam
- respondent
Bandu Naik
Coram
J. SREENIVAS RAO
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/2373/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court