Allowed

Chencharapu Krishna Reddy v. The District Collector, at Subedari Hanamkonda

Telangana HC12 Apr 2023WP/29128/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a writ petition challenging the acquisition of land. The court noted that the acquisition proceedings had been withdrawn with a no-action order. Consequently, the court held that the cause of action no longer survived for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is closed without costs as the acquisition proceedings have been withdrawn.

Chencharapu Krishna Reddy Vs The District Collector, at… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s6 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 29128 OF 2008

¶7

Between:

¶8

Chencharapu Krishna Reddy, S/o.Raji Reddy Agriculture R/o.Siddipet Road, Jangaon Town, Warangal District.

¶9

Chencharapu Yadava Reddy, S/o.Raji Reddy Agriculture R/o.Opp: Govt Hospital, Jangaon Town, Warangal District.

¶10

Chencharapu Chokka Reddy, S/o.Raji Reddy Agriculture Rl/o.Reddywada, Jangaon Town, Warangal District.

¶11

Chencharapu Srinivasa Reddy, S/o.Late Laxma Reddy Agriculture Rl/o.Gimigadda, Jangaon Town, Warangal District.

¶12

Chencharapu Ramachandra Reddy, S/o.Late Laxma Reddy Agriculture Fl/o.Girnigadda, Jangaon Town, Warangal District.

¶13

Chencharapu Sugunamma, Wo.Gopal Reddy Household Ri/o.Opp: Govt Hospital, Jangaon Town, Warangal District.

¶14

...'ET'T.ONERS

¶15

AND

¶16

The District Collector, at Subedari Hanamkonda, Warangal City & Warangal District.

¶17

The Land Acquisition Officer & Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangaon^Revenue Division' warangal District'

¶18

...RES'.NDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High^{Court maybe} pleased to issue a writ or order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in^proposing to acquire the petitioners' land admeasuring Ac.17.22 gts., in Sy.No. 429 of Jangaon village & Mandal, Warangal District, in^pursuance of Notification^No. Warangal/LAHsl12l20}7 dt. 8.11.20O7 on the file of the 1st^{respondent,as} arbitrary, illegal, high handed one, discriminatory and^{violative of Art. 14 & 21 ot} the Constitution of lndia

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(W PMP. NO: 38063 OF 2008)

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Court may be pleasedto} stay of all further^proceedings including taking^{possession of the petitioners' land} admeasuring Ac.17.22 gts., in Sy.No.429 of^{JangaonVillage &Mandal,} Warangal District, in^pursuance of Notification No.Warangal/LAHS/1212007^dated 8.11.2007 on the file of the 1st respondent,^pendingW.P.

¶22

l.A. NO: 1 OF 20090 {VIvlP. NO: 1430 oF 2009)

¶23

Between:

¶24

1 The District Co lector, at Subedari Hanamkonda, Warant;ar Ciiy & Warangal District.

¶25

2 The Land Acqr- isition officer & Revenue Divisionar offic.r, Jangaon Revenue Division, Warar gal District.

¶26

AND

¶27

...PETlTlONt:RS/FIESPONDENTS

¶28

chencharapr-r I ri_shna Red_dy, s/o.Raji Reddy Agricurture Rl/o.Siddipet Road, Jangaon Town, Warangal DiStrict.

¶29

Chencharapr, "adava Reddy, S/o Raji Reddy Agricu ture Fl/o.Opp: Govt Hospital, Janga rn Town, Warangal Distiict.

¶30

2 Chencharapu⁽ hokka n"g9y,. Slo.Rali Reddy Agricultrrr: Fyo.Reddywada, Jangaon Town. //arangal Disirict.

¶31

Chen-charapu Srinivasa Reddy, S/o.Lgte Laxma F edrJy Agriculture Rl/o.Girnigadda, Jangaon Town, Warangal District.

¶32

E thengharapu^{I lamachandraReddy, -S/o_Late Laxmat?eddy} Agriculture Rl/o.Girnigadda Jangaon Town, Warangal District.

¶33

b. 919!g!,rr?p,^{Suqjrnamma,WoG_opit Reddy HousetrotdlVo.Opp:Govt} Hosprtat, Jangac n Town, Warangal District.

¶34

...RESPONDEN'TS/PET]TIONERS

¶35

Petition under s ection 151 cpc praying that in the circL mstances stated in the affidavit filed^rn support of the petition, the High court may :e pleased to vacate the interim orde r granted in wp Mp No.38063 of 2008 n WF, No.29.l28 of 2008 dt 22-1-2009

¶36

Counsel for the Petitio rers: SRl. B. NARAYANA REDDy

¶37

Counsel for the Respo rdents: Gp FOR LAND ACQUISITION

¶38

The Court made the fol owing: ORDER

¶39

TITE HOIV'BLE SRI J(,STICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KT'MAR trIRIT PETITIOIT No.29128 of2008

¶40

ORDER:

¶41

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government^pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for the respondents

¶42

This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to acquire the petitioners, land aclmeasuring Acs.l7.22 guntas in Survey No.429 situated at Jangaon Village and Mandal, Warangal District, pursuant to thc noti{lcation Ncr.Warangal/LAHS/ t2 I 2OOZ, d,ated OB.tt.2OO7, as arbirrary and illegal.

¶43

\ \

¶44

'I'his Court granted interim direction on 22.OL.2OO9 clirecting the respondcnts not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective lands, until further orders.

¶45

Today when the matter is taken up, it is represented by learned Government pleader for Land Acquisition that the acquisition proposals have been withdrawn by the respondents and in this regard, the respondent No. I addressed a letter in

¶46

¶47

Lr.No.G2/',437/2OOZ, dated 06.I1.2010 tc, rhe ;.er;pondent No.2 herein and as such the proceedings were already dropped.

¶48

ln tle clrcumstances, as the P].oPos:cl zrcquisition procee<lings initiated through the notifi<:a; iorL, dated o8.r1.2007 u,ere withdrarvn, the cause in thr :resent writ petition does not survive for adjudication

¶49

The rvr: I petition is accordingly closed Thr:r't: sh,tll be no order as to r_-o ;ts.

¶50

Miscella reous petitions, if anY, pend ing I rr t[ is rvrit petition shall s ,and closed.

¶51

To,

¶52

essrsi'I[:ihIEiJiiltH //TRUE COPYII t. sl:(:TloN oFFlcER

¶53

1 Two ccs to GF,F lR LAND Acn,qrrr^^r L,:-L ^ Q u I s I r I o N' H is h co tr rt ro r h r -' s I a te o r

¶54

2 I"-l: ls: l, e !^{yi, ;; ;r'A'rbD(ftc} 1 iff^{33:""r:S'B NARAYANAREDD',Advocate ropucr} GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 210412023

ORDER

WP.No.29128 tf 2008

G- \ ..\t
\
t
a..rS ( , \i
!
,
)J: E ;)
q
o c*Js Ot
) .,/
. at.
,
!-t i viox,. y'

¶61

CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT CO:JTS

¶62

Chencharapu Krishna Reddy v. The District Collector, at Subedari Hanamkonda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chencharapu Krishna Reddy v. The District Collector, at Subedari Hanamkonda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Punati Shashi Kiran Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

T. Rajaram Vs The State of Telangana

Ms. Qurishitha Begum Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.P.Balamani Vs The Government of A.P. rep. by its The District Collector

Janapally Kishan Vs The District Collector

Netaji Plot Owners, Hyd Vs the Dist Revenue Officer, Medak Dist and 6 Others