The High Court closed the writ petition declaring it infructuous based on the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration's subsequent order. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
I lr
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAYOF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO:2640 OF2008
Between:
Netaii Plot owners welfareAssociation, RegdNo.78/2006commnAddr. LIG 375. noat t\o.g,fpHB ColonyKukatpally, Hyderabad,Rep'by its General Secretary Sri P.Upendra LakshmanRao.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
I I
Petition Undr r Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia prerying that in the circumstances slaj rd in the affidavit filed therewith, the l.-igh Court may be pleased to issue ir u,rit of Nrlandamus or any other appr tgrriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondent in invol< r'g llec.90 of Land Revenue Ac.1317: as;il and issuing proceedings vide Rc Nc. A'l /127512003,Dt.24-2004 adding 75.- i itcres and consequently the Second Fl,: ;pondent preparing a correction Sketctr Dt.15-4-2004 for Aminpur(V) adding Sy.1,o.1169,1170&117'l and shifting the bcln,lary line between the Aminpur, Bacl-erallv & Bollarum(V) which were comrr uicated to the petitioner Associatior vicle proceedings No.D/2081/2007,dt t-'O-2OO7 by the 7th respondent as il-.gal, arbitrary and without jurisdir;tion ;rn J set aside the same and further dire:t the 2n0 respondent to follow the originz (/) Map of Aminpur(V) if any survey is re,ing conducted.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 20161t 1,tpgr. NO: 49794 OF 2016)
Petition unde, Section 151 CPC praying that in the circr.mstances stated in the affidavit filed in s.tpport of the petition, the High Court rna;, be pleased to permit this responrl trt to file the additionat counter affidz v t in WP.No.2640of 2008.
Counsel for the Pe: tioners : SRI.C.RAGHU
Counsel for the Re,: pondent Nos.1, 2, 7 & 8 : GP FOR REVt:t\lUE
Counsel for the Re:: pondent No.3: SRI.G.ARUN KUMAR
Counsel for the Re:; pondent No.4 : SRI.A.V.SESHA SAI
Counsel for the Re:i pondent No.5 : SRI.P.DURGA PRASAD
Counsel for the Rer; ocrndent No.6 : SRI.G.PEDDA BABU
Counsel for the Rer; oondent No.g : SRI.VIJAY B.PAROPAK ARI
The Court made th(! following ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.264O of 2OO8
ORDER:
Sri.Ravinder. learned cotrnsel representing Sri.C.Raghu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has become infructr-rous, in view of the order passed by the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Telangana State, Hyderabad, in proceeding No.F1/ 1265l2016 dated 31.O7.2O18.
Miscellaneous applications, ll an_rr, irendin.g shall stand
closed.
\
SD/- G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT-EEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// secrcdPorrtcen
To l.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad. [OUTI
,. .. **-,--..--"-.
"wL_
I
q
I t
0 /
HIGH COUR]
DATED:1 210412023
ORDER
WP.No.2640 ,rf'2008
I a .<br>'1; .+
f t\i
It :
Irc ? rl H!fl 2[fi
<br>o_
-. .-::.,
CLOSING TFIE W.P
WITHOUT C(ISTS.
B
Netaii Plot owners welfare Association
District Revenue Officer, Medak
Assistant Director-survey & Land Records, Medak
J.S.Rao
G.V.Krishnam Raju
Venkata Ramana Colony, Plot Onwers Association
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
