High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to cancel a legal heir certificate and set aside related proceedings as infructuous because the cause of action had ceased to exist for adjudication.
No relief granted. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 27920 OF 2009
Between:
Zaheda Begum, W/o. Late Shaik Mahabub Household R/o. D.No. 3-2-1 1, Veerannapet, Mahabubnagar Town and District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No.F/3281/2009 dated 21.10.2009 issued by the 2nd repsondent / Revenue Divisional Officer canceling the Legal Heir Certificate dated 21 .10.2003 issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Mahabubnagar in File No.E/274212003 as illegal, arbitrary, .contrary to the principles of natural justice and has the effect of violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petition er ula 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently to set aside the proceedings No.F/328'1/2009 dated 21 .10.2009 issued by the 2nd repsondent
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 36363 oF 2009)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No.F/3281/2009 dated 21.1O.2Ct09 of the 2nd repsondent
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. VENKATESH GUPTA
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respondent No. 4: SRI L. HARISH
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENryAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.2792O of 2OO9
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGI TRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1 . One CC to Sri K Venkatesh Gupta Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUTJ 3. One CC to Sri L. Harish, Advocate(OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies MBC GJP >b-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1411212023
1 E S T r €'
q,
202 I t)
co I 5 JhN .b
\ *
k 0Fspr,.tC
ORDER
WP.No.27920 of 2009
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS
IN FRUCTUOUS, WITHOIJT COSTS
#
Zaheda Begum
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahabubnagar
Tahsildar, Mahabubnagar
Mohd. I., 4oosa
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
