Dismissed

Gandham Padma Latha v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Oct 2023WP/27638/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 challenging the Sub-Registrar's refusal to consider their representation regarding property registration. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition which was granted, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted and the writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Gandham Padma Latha Vs State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^320s ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 27638 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Gandham Padma Latha, W/o. Gandham Suresh, Aged about 4g years, Occ . Housewife, H. No.'l 2-1 1 -376, Warasiguda, Secund6rabad, Telangana.

¶9

I. Shilpa Sagar, . Wo. T Naresh Kumar, Aged about 37 years, Occ . Housewife, H. No. 1 2- 1 1 -2 1 2, W arasiguda, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

1 State of Telangana, Rgq. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad,-Telangana-500063.

¶13

2 The District Collector, lVledchal tvlalkajgiri District, Telangana. 2 ]_he,^{DlstrlctRegistlar, Registration and StampsDepartment,Medchal} Malkajgiri District, Telangana.

¶14

4 The Sub-Registrar, RO, Keesara, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Telangana.

¶15

q Smt. M B T Sundari, Wo. Late P. Mohan, Age 74 years, Occ . Housewife, H.No.1-3-49/104/33, Old Alaw, Secunderabad, Teiangaria,

¶16

6 P. Kiran Kumar, S/o. Late P. Mohan, Age 46 years, Occ. Business, H.No.1-3491104133, Old Alaw, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶17

7 Sm! Arji Padmavathi, Wo Arji Shankar Rao, Age 6'l years, Occ: House wife, H.No. 49-18-14, Lalitha Nagar, Akkalyyapalem, Vishakapatnam , Andhra Pradesh 530016.

¶18

I Smt Arji Laxmi Devi, Wo Arli Manoj Kumar, Age 37 years, Occ: House wife, H.No. 49-1 8-1 4, Lalitha Nagar, Akkalyyapalem, Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530016.

¶19

Smt Arji Srisha, W/o Arji Pavan Kumar, Age 36 years, Occ: House wife, H.No. 49-1 8-14, Lalitha Nagar, Akkalyyapalem, Vishakapatnam , Andhra Pradesh 5300'16.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution o[ lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in refusing to consider the Representation dt.01 .09.2023 submitted by the Petitioners requesting them not to entertain any tra n sactio n/tra n sfer on property i. e., Plot Nos.55, 56, 57, 58 (Sector-B) Total admeaswing 1279 Sq.yds, covered by Sy.No.272 & 273 situated at Rampally Village, Keesrar Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, as illegal. arbitrary and against principles of Natural^justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 to consider petitioners represenlation dated 01-09-2023.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P. SAI SANTOSH

¶23

Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI B. OILEEP KUMAR,

¶24

AGP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

HONBLE DT, JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶27

lllRIT PETITION No.27638 0F 2023

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the Court to declare the action of respondent No.4 in refusing to consider the Representation dateci O I .O9 .2023 submitted by the petitioners requesting nol to cntertain any transaction in respect of the subject irropert].i.e., plot Nos.55, 56, 57, 5g (Sector-B), total admeasuring 1,279 square yards, located in Sy.Nos.272 ar d 273 of Rampally Village, Keesara Mzurdal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to Cirect respondent No.4 to consider the said rcprescn t a tion.

¶30

Sri P.Sai Santosh, learned counsel for the petitioners,

¶31

seeks permission to u,ithdraw the Writ petition.

¶32

Permission, as prayed for, is accorded

¶33

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs

¶34

¶35

¶36

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if

¶37

anr', shall sternd closed

¶38

SD/. P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// @

¶39

To,

¶40

SECTION OFFICER

¶41

1 . One CC to Sri P. Sai Santosh, Advocate [OpUC]

¶42

Two CCs to GP for Stamps and Registration, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶43

Two CD Copies

GJ GJ

P^(q.

HIGH COURT

DATED:1211012023

ORDER

a.|
t
t!
,cl H*

WP.No.27638 of 2023

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶52

c, a\ri>3'

Gandham Padma Latha v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gandham Padma Latha v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

PeramMurahari Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Kotha Mangala Sai Krishna Vs The State of Telangana

Gondi Samuel Krupanand Vs The State of Telangana

Kondapally Satya Sheel Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by

M/s Vedik Estates and Constructions Vs The State of Telangana

Sajitha Munagala, Vs The State of Telangana