The Court allowed withdrawal of a Writ Petition challenging the registration of a cancellation deed by the Sub-Registrar, Hyderabad. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition was accorded. The Writ Petition was dismissed. Interim order granted earlier was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[320e 1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2762 OF 2012
Between:
Kondapally Satya Sheel, S/o. Udayananda Reddy Student, Being Minor Rep by his Father and Natrual Guardian K. Udayananda Reddy S/o. Ram Reddy a/a 53 Yrs Occ Business Fl/o. H.No. 85, Green Avenue, Nizampaet Road,
...pETtTtoNER
AND
...REspoNoENrs Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue an order or direction or a writ more in the form of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in registering the cancellation deed vide doc. No. 1307111, dl. 26.5.2011, by the 2nd respondent as void, non est in the eye of law, against the Provisions of Section 122 and 126 of the Transfer of Property Act, non operative illegal, arbitrary, and in gross violation of principals of naturaljustice
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 3452OF 20121
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the doc. No. 1307/1 1 , dt. 26.5.2011 in the office of 2nd respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. JAIPAL REDDY
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respondent No. 3: SRI B. NALIN KUMAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
HOI{fBLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION No.2762 0F 2012
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the Court to declare the action of respondent No.2 i.e., the Sub-Registrar, Kapra, Hyderabad, in registering the cancellation deed uide document No.13O7 of 2011, dated 26.05.2011, as illegal, void and against the provisions of Sections r22 and 126 of the Transfer of property Act.
vacated.
'R|-SI?ltY'f*F"Hi[lu--,/TRUECOPY" SECTIONoFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1211012023
.,6 STAr
t
q
(.) I ii Nl\i zi:l vzo
4'r<br>
C55 p7..', CY\t1)
ORDER
WP.No.2762 of 2012
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
+cf<) Yteffi;
WITHOUT COSTS
Kondapally Satya Sheel
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Sub-Registrar, Kapra, Hyderabad
K. Suseela Devi
CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
