The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous since the cause for adjudication did not survive, per the counsel's submission. The order is a one-line disposal without elaboration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.27030 of 2018
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri C. Sri Hari Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri Pitta Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any,
shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
24 February, 2023 HK/PSW
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.27030 of 2018
24 February, 2023 HK/PSW
3
Sri Pitta Srinivasa Reddy
Respondent
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
