Writ petition challenging disconnection of power supply without notice was dismissed as infructuous by this Court on counsel's submission that the cause does not survive.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, to stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26972 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
(WP stands dismissed for default against R3 for non compliance ofC.O. ot. 13-4-20171
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more in the natureof writof Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents1 and 2 in disconnectingthe powersupply to the petitioners service connectionNos. L4-17788 ,L4-22438,L4-23955 in premises bearing H.No.13-6-825l1lAl1lA, Nloghal Nagar,Guddimalkapur, Hyderabad, without any notice and atthe behestof the Mandal Revenueofficer, Asifnagar, as illegal, arbitrary andin violationof principlesof natural justiceand consequently direct the respondents1 and2 to fo(hwith restorethe power supply to the petitioners service connections.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPM P. NO: 33727 OF 2014)
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents'l and 2 to forthwith restore the power supply to the petitioners service connection Nos. L4-17788, L4-22438, L4-23S5S in premises bearing H.No.13-6-825l1lAl1lA, Ivloghal Nagar,Guddimalkapur, Asifnagar, pending disposal of the above writ petrtion.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI THAKUR SINGH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and 2: SRI R. VINOD REDDY(SC FOR TSSPDCL)
The Court made the following: OROER
I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO.26972 of 2OL4
ORDER:
l,earned counsel representing Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned counsel for respondent/TssPDCL submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survlve.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall
stand closed.
SD/. K. VENKAIAH ASSTSTANT REGITiTRAR //TRUE COPY// N, SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri Thakur Singh, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SriR. VinodReOOy(SCfor TSSPDCL) [OPUCI 3. Two CD CoPies
TJ SB $$-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1611112023
ORDER
WP.No.26972 ot 2014
STAI€
,<<br>,ao-
tz
f, o
ri 0n 0E J ?t21
*
t
O.r q rra -i C,"
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
.,..r) 'k"' r
Saraswathi Bai
Viswajeeth Hazari
APCPDCL
The Addl. Assistant Engineer
Justice Nagesh Bheemapak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
