The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition calling for the award of a work order as infructuous upon submission that the cause no longer survives.
No order passed on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26100 OF 2023
Between:
Mi s. [Vlurali Manpower Agencies, Rep by its ProprietorChikkalaMuralidhar S/o.Chikkala Surya Rao 0/ o. SRT 282 Main St Opp Toyota Showroom, Sanath Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500018.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmaybe pleased to issue an Order, Writ or direction more particularly in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus, a. Declaring the action of the Respondentsspecifically Respondent No. 3 in not considering the Representationdated 16.09.2023 for awarding the work order to the Petitioner is bad, arbitrary,illegal, unconstitutiona l, violative of Article 14,21 of the Constitution of lndia b. Consequently,directthe Respondents to follow the Evaluation criteria enumerated inthe specialterms and conditions in the tender notification dated 24.11.2022and allot the Work order to the Petitioner
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ.urnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents specifically Respondent No.3 to consider the Representation dated 16.09.2023 in view of the special terms and cond tions in the tender notification daled 2411112022 inlhe mean time of pendencyof writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI DADI RADHA KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY (SC FOR STNGARENT COLLTERTES CO LTD)
Counsel forthe Respondent No.7 i -. - --
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
U/RIT PETITION NO.261OO of 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall
stand closed.
\ sol-v.ra HA ASSISTANTREGIS R
To
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION FICER
Kj. GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:15/11/2023
ORDER
1 6€. STAI €'
+
/io
d oE oEc zozl il
,t.
i
i. t( DssnntCt't d..!
WP.No.26100 ot 2023
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
LL, fl 1,{
ES
r\zV
M/s Vlurali Manpower Agencies Rep by its Proprietor Chikkala Muralidhar
The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd
The Director, The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd
Nagesh Bheemapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
