Petitioners seeking writ to quash illegal construction and direct authorities to take action. Court allowed withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to approach authorities, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach concerned authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTYFIFTH DAYOF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUST]CE T.VINODKUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 266740F 2023
Between:
Represented byits GPA Holder ArumugamsenthilKumar Petitioner No.1 herein
Both residing at H.No.16-11-16/89/90,Saleem Nagar Colony'Malakpet' Hyderabad-500036.
.....PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ order or direction moreparticularly one in the natureof Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of therespondent No.2 and 3 in not taking any action inpreventing the illegal construction/encroachmentpursuant to the representation dated 28tO712023 and15109t2023 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and in violation of Principles ofNatural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14 and1 5 of the Constitutionof lndia.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2023
Petition Under Section'151 CPCpraying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court maybe pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to takeaction againstthe illegal construction and encroachment of the scheduleproperty and consequently.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI RAPOLUPRAVEEN
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GPFORMCPLADMN AND URBAN DEV
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 :SRIM.DURGA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : 1-
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Vlrit Petition No. 26674 of 2o23
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ petition with liberty ro approach the concerned authorities
AS.i'?f-ihttill+'^H //rRUE coPY// (fi
SECTI6NOFFICER
to ',. ,*o CCs to GP FoR MCPL ADMN AN-D URBAN DEV' High Court for the
3 i'ii":: i:Effl:i:ti"'i:*fh{i'Hh tsrtsi
SA sB Fr
HIGH COURT
DATED:2510912023
---_=::t:-*+
-;-r?A rr, 1;;-: l-
o
1
i \1 T$ND
,..
ORDER
WP.No.26674 of 2023
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
+.qe4 ffit
Arumugam Senthil Kumar
Arumugam Srinivasan
State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Karthik Balakrishnan
Tirumalai Selvi Balakrishnan
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
